lourencojml.bsky.social
Pathogen Population Biology Lab
@ Católica Biomedical Research Center
Lisbon, Portugal
https://cbr.fm.ucp.pt/en/node/7111
Spaceships & pathogens.
61 posts
707 followers
766 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Cry.
comment in response to
post
Exactly.
comment in response to
post
Just cancel and move on.
comment in response to
post
Because targeting very specific USA companies that are unique globally will make Trump get some nasty industry enemies.
comment in response to
post
@royalsociety.org is on BlueSky. You should tag them more often. Make them know they are, from now on, irrelevant to the very own people they are supposed to represent.
comment in response to
post
Scientists should give up on voicing their opinion about this and shift to actively treating the Society as irrelevant - which is what it is, really. Cancel it. Give up on it. Make it clear to the public that it does not represent you.
comment in response to
post
"Let it burn baby"
comment in response to
post
Just stop. No one sees you like this anymore. The marketing is unnecessary.
comment in response to
post
"The world's most prestigious science institution".
comment in response to
post
There isn't an explanation.
comment in response to
post
Voyager.
comment in response to
post
How did this come to be planned for delivery? Who accepted this?
comment in response to
post
Nice.
comment in response to
post
There's no sign of shame. It baffles me.
comment in response to
post
You are an embarrassment of a boy's club.
comment in response to
post
38/250 is Regional variation in the landscape ecology of West Nile virus sentinel chicken seroconversion in Florida
VBD landscape ecology needs to consider vector, host, and virus - nice to see it split out regionally to allow for that
comment in response to
post
Surely the solution is to keep 4 and kick the odd one out (Mr Fart).
comment in response to
post
I doubt any of these guys have what it takes.
comment in response to
post
Why would his approval rate mean anything if he is setting the ground to do whatever he wants, including a rein over the military class? Not sure people understand what his strategy is. Spotlight: it's not to get approval rates up.
comment in response to
post
Lol
comment in response to
post
I would add that scientists take action on facts: not done when accepting Mr Tesla to get in. And agreed, they change their minds based on facts: not being done ATM. The entire reasoning of these people is broken.
comment in response to
post
A boys club playing righteous.
comment in response to
post
Sadly hope (that it will be OK) is another way they would frame their current position :)
comment in response to
post
Agreed. It has been a boys club for so long, did we really expect differently?
comment in response to
post
Why would this imply less effective vaccines. If the science and the policy doesn't happen there, it happens elsewhere. As always.
comment in response to
post
Evolution is blind.
comment in response to
post
Why is it disappointing? Has no one paid attention to her contributions during the pandemic? Is more of the same.
comment in response to
post
I am living the soap opera. Let it roll.
comment in response to
post
Won't last forever mate, just hold tight for now
comment in response to
post
That controller is top.
comment in response to
post
Yay
comment in response to
post
We don't actually know for how long Kiddo was homeless. From her behaviour, didn't look like she was used to people. By "this time of the year" I meant Xmas :) there's always a boom in abandoned pets or offered to rescue centers. Supposedly, because people regret getting one for Xmas.
comment in response to
post
This is cool.
comment in response to
post
Your profile photo is awesome.
comment in response to
post
The seminal hypothesis framework for this has been around for more than 25 years, with numerous following papers demonstrating it for viruses and bacteria. I recommend having a look at the paper from 1998.
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
comment in response to
post
Hi! Citation limit is a pain. Citing the 1998 paper would have been ideal because it was seminal to all others & is independent since it has no authors of the current paper. It's nice to have readers check how the original idea evolved over +25y. That's why I added my comment.
comment in response to
post
This is great material to feed the far-right anti-science agenda.
comment in response to
post
On Twitter we used to Tweet. On X we Xheet (s**t).
comment in response to
post
There is good number of papers in the literature applying this hypothesis to a few pathogens, both at the epidemiological and genetic level. Namely Strep. pneumo and Influenza A. I recommend having a look :)
comment in response to
post
Interesting indeed.
The idea has been established for decades now.
Strangely not cited.
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
comment in response to
post
This thread is funny.