Profile avatar
poodleskirt.bsky.social
Living like a bug ain't easy
183 posts 91 followers 183 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
People in tech are still largely left wing, the "swing right" didn't happen. I think what you're picking up on is the trend towards anti-tech sentiment among online leftists that's been developing over the last ~8 years or so.
comment in response to post
Very robbery coded. (removes sunglasses) The perp was snatch maxxing.
comment in response to post
writing papers for school does not require love
comment in response to post
Also you are only loosely disincentivized from having the characters die, IMO. Having people survive is the goal, but the deaths are part of the fun.
comment in response to post
Yeah it makes a big deal of its branching paths and people can die, I actually don't know if you can even reload cuz I've never done it that way, I just play it as a visual novel. I was imagining by "forgiving" you kind of just meant like, you're not rationing bullets in an RE game or something
comment in response to post
I would say Until Dawn and all the dark pictures games. Horror games but there's not much needed from you other than some quicktime events and dialogue choices.
comment in response to post
it's ok pauper monday around the corner
comment in response to post
True but it's kind of the CEOs job to be delusional in that specific way
comment in response to post
Half the people on here are bean dad, if you had the eyes to see
comment in response to post
Actually, she's one trans woman being targeted with discriminatory legislation by the majority party in the US house of representatives, and she simply isn't responding the way you and the republicans both wish she would. She is not a coward.
comment in response to post
No they aren't but okay
comment in response to post
I would really think it's on basically everyone *except* her to bring the fight, while she calmly doesn't take the bait.
comment in response to post
Neat!
comment in response to post
I see. You obviously know better than me, but I'm curious what the end game scenario is, building your own data center? Seems like many potential headaches down that road but I've only ever done things the easy way.
comment in response to post
>More servers in the mail. Is this literal? Why do you buy your own?
comment in response to post
senior year papers where I truly thought there was a chance they would somehow be "rejected" by the prof for how lazy they were, were some of the best grades I've ever gotten
comment in response to post
puppering* on boomers
comment in response to post
this is weird
comment in response to post
The second time I wrote "cost of production" I meant "cost of development"
comment in response to post
Yeah it's pretty mind boggling. All I can think of is sales volume (best selling PS1 game was ~10mil units, best selling PS4 game was ~20mil units), and reduced cost of production with digital sales. But cost of production has also presumably skyrocketed so idk. I don't get it
comment in response to post
I agree it's a really silly claim to make out of nowhere, but boxing is marred by scandal historically in the olympics (it's pretty interesting - not players fixing but corrupt judges etc.) so it wouldn't be the most surprising thing in the world. It's worth looking up just to read about.
comment in response to post
The world is becoming too connected. If I am forced to read young people's opinions then I will inappropriately use their slang until I'm dead.
comment in response to post
Any teachable moments here?? I didn't know about this person and have no clue what happened
comment in response to post
(If your interpretation is the case): It's a little obnoxious to me that religious people could potentially claim there is no malice, when the text from god himself doesn't sound that chuffed with the people he's supposedly condemning, but alas.
comment in response to post
FWIW I agree with you that votes are essentially erased, but not with your reasoning. From the jump EC proportionately shrinks or magnifies your vote compared to a similar voter in another state, and in almost all states votes from the losing party are essentially "erased" once the state is called.
comment in response to post
>the bill seems to argue that discrimination from religious or scientific belief is a first amendment right The thing I'm missing though is that even if this is true, it's still "discrimination" by any interpretation of that word, so why would it be defamation to say so?