twocanoes.bsky.social
105 posts
27 followers
27 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
All candidates are human and greed is a hard thing to resist if given too much power. Limiting that power via term limits and RCV keeps everyone in check!
comment in response to
post
He's not a king. They know it's a bad idea. He's a poor negotiator and a weak leader.
America needs to implement ranked choice voting (RCV) so Americans have the opportunity to vote for less radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We must support candidates who support ranked choice voting (RCV). It will remove the liklihood of voting for radical nominees for our government positions.
comment in response to
post
He's a weak leader and a poor negotiator.
America needs ranked choice voting (RCV). RCV removes the popularity from radical candidates and does not give them a platform to stand on.
comment in response to
post
He is a poor negotiator that does not stand behind his threats. He's weak and only knows how to threaten. He does not know how to lead or find a compromise.
America needs ranked choice voting (RCV). We need to give Americans the opportunity to vote "for" people; not "against the other party".
comment in response to
post
He's settling for easy wins because he knows he can't make real change.
We really need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide. Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
Agreed. We need to educate the average American about the benefits of RCV and then support candidates who also support RCV.
We have to literally start at the bottom because we can't expect to see the people at the top change.
comment in response to
post
He is not a king. He is not a string negotiator. He is a weak leader that cannot work with the other branches of the American government.
We need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide. Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We really need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide. Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
He's a weak negotiator and uses empty threats to strong arm other countries.
He's not a king. He's only one branch of the government.
We need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide in America. Ranked choice voting will reduce the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
He's not a king. He's only one branch of the government. He has no negotiating skills. He's a weak leader.
We really need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide. Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
He's not a king. He's only one branch of the government.
We really need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide. Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
Oh 100%. Implementing ranked choice voting will significantly reduce the power of the republican and democratic parties.
I'm just hoping enough voters become informed about RCV and will vote for any candidate that supports RCV.
It'll be a slow hill to climb but we've gotta start somewhere.
comment in response to
post
He has no power or negotiating skills. Threats and the lack of following through only show him as a weak leader.
We really need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide. Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
He's not a king. He's only one branch of the government.
We really need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide. Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
He has no real power. He's only one branch of the government.
We really need ranked choice voting (RCV) nationwide. Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
It's used in Canada and Australia and a few other countries. It's also used in Maine and Alaska in the US.
comment in response to
post
Yup. Maybe things have gotten so bad that moderate republicans don't want to support radical republicans? We can only hope...
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.
comment in response to
post
We need ranked choice voting (RCV). Ranked choice voting reduces the liklihood of electing radical candidates.