It'll be bad enough if they fail to send out SS checks.
It'd be amazing if they somehow make it worse by insisting anyone complaining is a liar and a cheat.
It'd be amazing if they somehow make it worse by insisting anyone complaining is a liar and a cheat.
Reposted from
MeidasTouch
Trump’s commerce secretary Howard Lutnick says if Social Security skipped a check, his mother-in-law wouldn’t complain—and if you would, it indicates you are probably a fraudster. Insane.
Comments
And to think we thought the Trump Administration would be bad for foreign travel.
This is insanity.
Cruelty is the point.
Justice would be having every future complaint forwarded to him personally.
(Edited 3:15 PM via @skeetsapp.com)
Most elderly people on Social Security are living check to check.
If one gets missed, they risk eviction, a missed prescription refill, or starvation.
The number of calls Congress would get would be a RIOT. And then there would be an ACTUAL riot of senior citizens—both those who rely on SSA and those who don’t. If it weren’t for the hardship that some might face, I’d love for them not to send the checks. Holy kittycats.
And I seriously doubt I'm wrong about the asshole part.
New round of frog boiling starts now
But ffs does Lutnick's mother-in-law seriously rely on Social Security? What does this say about Lutnick's domestic policy?
You can't make this shit up.
smdh