Seeing folks on the other site claim that Alien Enemy Act removals are not reviewable by courts.
The statute explicitly requires "a full examination and hearing," and there are literally *dozens* of reported cases from the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II:
https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/9549-lcb114art5vladekpdf
The statute explicitly requires "a full examination and hearing," and there are literally *dozens* of reported cases from the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II:
https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/9549-lcb114art5vladekpdf
Comments
Sooooo, a simple "deport THIS" will suffice. Oh, and..
Infectious diseases;
Weather;
Law;
Alien Enemies Act.
And they're ALL the SAME PERSON.
up to speed. Habeas Corpus is fundamental. Without it : no freedom, no democracy.
So what if it ruins a few lives.
Law in normal countries is precedental - it doesn't revere documents set centuries ago and is thus not open to the same kind of expoitation.
Next they’ll invoke the Insurrection Act to go after some of “us.” After that martial law will be declared over the entire country
American democracy hangs by a thread. It’s the fight of our lives 💪
1. Did I read right that Section 3 was ruled in 19th century to only guarantee judicial hearings if the judicial branch was used at option of the executive?
2. Do the cases generally just allow inquiry into TdA membership?
Loving to learn is not applicable anymore
"Prisoner of War" has a very specific...
There aren't any brakes when the same hands are on all the levers of power at once.
https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/would-a-justice-kavanaugh-overturn-humphreys-executor-and-declare-independent-agencies-unconstitutional/
https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/132-five-questions-about-trumps-alien