I was against Hochul removing an elected official based on allegations.
Now, now that it’s clear that Eric Adams is willing to abrogate his official responsibilities in order to curry favor with the presidential administration in exchange for a non prosecution agreement, she has to remove him.
Now, now that it’s clear that Eric Adams is willing to abrogate his official responsibilities in order to curry favor with the presidential administration in exchange for a non prosecution agreement, she has to remove him.
Reposted from
Julian Sanchez
Before at least there was the argument that the ordinary criminal justice process should play out without gubernatorial interference. That argument is gone now. There is no excuse for leaving Adams in place a day longer.
Comments
https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-says-he-did-not-ask-new-york-mayors-case-be-dropped-2025-02-13/
Gov. Kathy Hochul:
FIRE ERIC ADAMS❕⚖️🇺🇸
Here's her number if anyone else would like to give her a call:
(518) 474-8390
https://www.governor.ny.gov/content/governor-contact-form
The cover-up is always worse than the crime.
No more, "What was the reason you voted for Trump/Adams/Leopards Eating People's Faces candidate?" More, "your vote was a stupid failure of civic responsibility."
Local DA's could help bring this to an end if they bothered to step up and enforce NY state laws
https://open.substack.com/pub/pitchforkslingshot/p/if-you-pay-new-york-city-taxes-eric?r=526836&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Congress could be passing meaningful legislation. Instead, they chose thieves
Yes!
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2024/09/26/multimedia/26adams-hochul-clwb/26adams-hochul-clwb-jumbo.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp
I don’t see how Hochul benefits politically by leaving Adams in place.
I mean …