The classic New Scientist correspondence page that discusses Nominative Determinism, ending with:
"So let the last word [on Nominative Determinisim] go to Andrew Lover, who writes to us expressing the earnest hope that nominative determinism is a real phenomenon. We hope so too, young Lover."
Comments
"So let the last word [on Nominative Determinisim] go to Andrew Lover, who writes to us expressing the earnest hope that nominative determinism is a real phenomenon. We hope so too, young Lover."
In a world full of insufferable assholes with too much money, I swear he has to be treating it like a competition at this point.
Makes you think.
"I just make fries"
That aside, if it's the family name, then his argument is thrown out if any member of the family doesn't sell burgers.
My family is not made entirely of mayors, however. In fact, most of my ancestors on that side were farmers & peasants.
The other side of my family is named Thomson. And yet, most of them were not sons of Toms.
I mean a serious guffaw and then some quality follow up giggles.
Insights
Will be lost. In time
Like.... Piss. Down the drain.
Also: alt text please.
When I'm calling you
Oo-Oo-Oo-Oo, Oo-Oo-Oo-Oo
Will you answer too?
Oo-Oo-Oo-Oo, Oo-Oo-Oo-Oo