They're like dogs fighting over a scrap of leather that they think is meat.
Ai will make us dumber. Over heard a uni student yesterday saying they used ChatGPT to summarise his required reading for seminars, and it made me despair. He's not learning then! What is the fucking point?
New comic idea! The same comic, but instead of feeding the yellow guy, another robot ingests the first robot's shit and spits out generated tweets talking about how bad the first robot is, but how great a third robot is, but the 3rd robot is also the first robot. 🤯
It's disturbing that AI has gotten good enough to recognize what's happening in the comic and respond to it in this manner. The alternative is that there's an army of drones manually generating this content.
I'm a little worried by how 'deep' some of those replies are, if you get me? (If they are indeed bot replies and not curated/final touched by some handler)
Like referencing either the yellow or the purple characters in the comic. Doing better than I thought most reply bots could do.
I love that they’re all so drafted replies so they’re kind of tangentially acknowledging the content of the comic and trying to make symbolic references of their own but none of them make any kind of logical sense or are funny in the slightest
follow-up comic of purple guy having the robot shit out an AI generated script who hands it to yellow guy who claims he'll read it but just hands it to another robot who eats it and shits out an AI generated script and hands it back to purple guy and it's a circle of life shit ouroboros with arrows
Haha when you're the purple guy I'm making the yellow guy some good points that's why openAIdata is making a purple guy to yellow in the good points. Haha!
It's accurate, particularly to the attitude of the 'yellow guys' that are out there (who are also all the tech-bros who want to turn us all into SNOW CRASH 'network states'...)
On one hand it could have been funnier with yellows face fully attached to the bot. But also, it's really hard to not say no to that awful stream of papoo.
Also the people who think the robot is an encyclopedia or google. LLMs are just sparkling predictive text, they're not actually looking up correct answers. The amount of people who don't get that drives me insane.
Recently my boss used AI to help her fill in some writing. She yelled from her office, “This is amazing!”…then ten minutes later, “This is complete nonsense!” AI filled in paragraphs with incomprehensible pointless sentences.
The writer stood there. The yellow man recoiled. The machine reached forth and took what was given, devouring the words, grinding them to dust within its maw. It wretched forth a spectral vomitus of letters, spilling into the mouth of the supplicant. The yellow man shuddered. And he was glad.
He’s not arguing this portrayal shows AI art lovers are invalid, he trusts that we already know it’s absolute shit loved by people with no taste or respect for craft
I’m just mocking AI art and the taste of its enthusiasts. You’re reframing it as being “incredibly enraged” and assuming I’ve not met or discussed it with said enthusiasts so you can be dismissive
Your "mockery" obviously comes from a place of seething rage. You're deluding yourself that you're a cool-headed smug critic, but you're just an angry baby, throwing a tantrum because people are having fun in a way you don't like.
A desperate swing and a pathetic miss. I'm a talented writer.
I'm not defending AI writing because I have an emotional need to - you're the one who's coping by attacking it. I'm just pointing out that anti-AI cultists are garbage "artists" who think they can raise their status by attacking something
Hitting the next word on your phone's autocomplete isn't what I'd consider "writing", but whatever helps you sleep at night after a long day of defending statistical text generators online, I guess...
i mean this is why i want them to make ML worse. it should be incoherent and inhuman and bad at its job because that makes it interesting. like a distortion pedal. give me interesting broken nonsense because mediocre slop is useless to someone who doesn't stand to make money off it.
I use it when I need to answer a colleague without sounding angry. I type my angry response to LeChat (since I'm a European gigachad) and ask it to make me sound less like a dick. It has been doing wonders to be honest...
I guess if you aren't writing anything important, yeah. If you need to include anything specific or include any points or for the email to have anything of value, then you actually need to proof read and rewrite it
Comments
cause its literally the reality of people who defend AI tooth and nail.
AI art is only art in the same way that Madden ‘98 is football.
Ai will make us dumber. Over heard a uni student yesterday saying they used ChatGPT to summarise his required reading for seminars, and it made me despair. He's not learning then! What is the fucking point?
Like referencing either the yellow or the purple characters in the comic. Doing better than I thought most reply bots could do.
Is it so difficult to open a word processor and start imagining a story?
It's accurate, particularly to the attitude of the 'yellow guys' that are out there (who are also all the tech-bros who want to turn us all into SNOW CRASH 'network states'...)
But yes.
Gross.
Works for all AI fart, I mean art.
Purple: it's not enough, they're bathing in our blood
a lot of grease.
This is why you're the artist.
I also do not like this one
See also "Everything Is A Remix" ->
Recently my boss used AI to help her fill in some writing. She yelled from her office, “This is amazing!”…then ten minutes later, “This is complete nonsense!” AI filled in paragraphs with incomprehensible pointless sentences.
Unfortunately in a lot of cases it's more like "took what it could find without asking for any permission"...
I’m just mocking AI art and the taste of its enthusiasts. You’re reframing it as being “incredibly enraged” and assuming I’ve not met or discussed it with said enthusiasts so you can be dismissive
It’s a pretty common tactic
You also sidestepped the obvious ethical issues to invent a view you can frame as unreasonable and support your assumption I’m “seething”
People having fun doesn’t bother me. These apps are best viewed as toys to begin with
I'm not defending AI writing because I have an emotional need to - you're the one who's coping by attacking it. I'm just pointing out that anti-AI cultists are garbage "artists" who think they can raise their status by attacking something
(Hope so)
i hate this so much
yet it is so real
reality is doomed