n0ogit.bsky.social
Marketer, web developer, classical guitarist & oil painter
36 posts
23 followers
43 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
lol
comment in response to
post
*inherently confusing for a bot whose purpose is to outrage and farm engagement.
comment in response to
post
Not convinced you’re not a bot but 👍
comment in response to
post
I’m saying it’s working as intended. I don’t assume that the Chinese government is trying to make their people happy. I’m not agreeing with it. You would realize that if you weren’t triggered for no reason.
comment in response to
post
Go away bot. I’m literally saying communism is bad and you’re ignoring it. China’s gdp has grown in recent years. Communism is a real thing that is working. Go annoy someone else.
comment in response to
post
Do you honestly think communist governments care about the happiness of their people and they believe that they are failing because of that? No…the communism they have enacted is working exactly as intended. Saying it doesn’t work is incorrect. That doesn’t mean it’s good for its citizens.
comment in response to
post
I’m guessing you’re a bot and assuming I’m promoting communism or something? I literally said I don’t condone communism, but it’s a very real thing and has produced a very successful economy and not acknowledging that is ignorant. You want evidence but are disregarding my evidence. What do you want?
comment in response to
post
It’s only a fantasy if you believe it’s a utopia. It’s a very really thing.
comment in response to
post
I never said that the Chinese people liked their communist government, but to say that communism “doesn’t work” is ignoring the fact that they are in contention to be the most powerful economy on the planet. It’s working as intended.
comment in response to
post
I also don’t think communism is the answer…but saying it never worked out in the past is ignoring that China is communist and there are other functioning communist countries right now.
comment in response to
post
I’m not saying that’s not what they are. I’m saying they should be objective and people should be responsible so we start holding shitty devs accountable and good devs get recognized. We disagree.
comment in response to
post
This was common on statues like this that were placed on pedestals and fountains and stuff so when you looked up at them their head looked proportional and not small because of the perspective
comment in response to
post
Completely agree that there’s not really an alternative, however, someone not enjoying a key part of it that they value while acknowledging a great game that other people will love isn’t negative. You don’t need to add your 2 cents to negatively impact something that isn’t relevant to you.
comment in response to
post
I don’t believe every product is for every person. Quite the opposite. A negative review on a good game hurts the devs. People are notoriously bad when it comes to knowing what they want, so negatively reviewing a game that’s not for you prevents others (who it is for) from trying it.
comment in response to
post
Reflect the quality of the game, perhaps? I think we will have to agree to disagree on this one.
comment in response to
post
People buy games they are interested in, but that doesn’t mean the game is actually what they were expecting. That doesn’t mean it’s a bad game. If these people give bad reviews, the only thing the rating is telling anyone is how mass appealing their game is, not how good it is.
comment in response to
post
Then you have people making good games and getting negative reviews because they aren’t appealing the widest audience possible. This is how AAA games got to where they are now. I agree with you that there shouldn’t be a neutral option…they should just simply not review the game.
comment in response to
post
Disagreement doesn’t equal hostility. You clarified what you meant in a comment after mine and after insulting me. Why wouldn’t I assume you’re a bot?
comment in response to
post
Considering there was no hostility in my comment and you’re clearing trying to outrage me by insulting my “comprehension and literacy” I’m going to assume you’re a bot and not actually interested in discussing difficulty.
comment in response to
post
Video game difficulty does matter because not everyone enjoys mashing one button for 40 hours until it’s over. If you want easy then fine, but don’t assume everyone wants that because you’re wrong. Difficulty options are the most important thing to make games appeal to larger audiences.
comment in response to
post
I have no opinion on whether it’s taught or not. I do, however, think it’s absurd that such a pointless thing is what triggers everyone and makes them jump to the conclusion their archaic education was superior and that kids are dumb. Why aren’t they getting triggered by actual issues?
comment in response to
post
I don’t disagree, but a holistic understanding of graphemics isn’t a priority or interest for everyone. They will continue to know how to read and write just fine. I was taught cursive in school and can still use it, yet I choose not to because it’s frilly and unnecessary calligraphy in my opinion.
comment in response to
post
You can learn to read and write without cursive
comment in response to
post
#BoneAppleTea
comment in response to
post
Yeah, unfortunately it just shows a glaring misunderstanding of what art even is.
comment in response to
post
Even tracing is not cheating in creating artwork, unless all you do it trace to copy something that already exists, but that’s just pointless anyway and you’ll be exposed sooner or later.
comment in response to
post
Same here. Occasionally there’s one that surprises me, but I feel like it’s just not sustainable. You can’t keep letting the majority of people down with bad games just to justify pushing technology forward. Just lower the budget and make a game worth existing to a specific audience.
comment in response to
post
Fair enough
comment in response to
post
I’m sorry, but I think you’re mistaking me for someone else. I never said games were mine, I simply said that if a game doesn’t challenge me I simply won’t play it, therefore I need a challenge. I see no reason why there can’t be difficulty options for everyone.
comment in response to
post
May I respectfully ask your opinion as to why you place 16 on this list?
comment in response to
post
It’s the standard if you try to target everyone you target no one situation. I also see games not offering a hard mode until you play through the mindless normal mode. Devs want to control the experience so much that it becomes barely a video game.
comment in response to
post
I’m concerned if games continue dumbing down their games even more to accommodate this mindset. Most AAA games are boring anymore because they’ve been pushing this for so long now. This is why Fromsoft has been so successful, because they respect your time and intelligence.
comment in response to
post
Happy birthday man! We’ve never met in person, but we spoke via email once a long time ago when Divekick was in development because I won the stage design contest. Fingers crossed for a sequel.
comment in response to
post
15, Rebirth and 16 are abominations if you compare them to previous final fantasies. Not only do “open world” games waste your time, but each one is an exact copy of all the others.