"ai is making it so everyone can make art"
everyone can make art dumbass it came free with your fucking humanity
everyone can make art dumbass it came free with your fucking humanity
Comments
Yes you can sing, you just never learned how to or practiced. Just do it.
So the future is here! The robots are writing and creating art and music, while the humans work their butts off... 🤖
...wait a minute! 🤔
"This song isn't really for humans..."
Me: Ok, but being an intolerable jackass is not a disability, and also, how dare you.
It's human imagination and vision that make the art. AI just allows people to cut and paste ideas from somewhere else. We need to recognise that those ideas were someone else's before AI stole them.
I'll figure it out eventually
we already have pinterest/stock images, & photoshop is a skill everyone can learn
"You may use this for personal use but it remains copyright of Miserysoft, even though we did not think of the prompt, style, create the training input or even the technology,..."
https://chat.openai.com/share/98b27def-9d73-49c1-9fe1-a7f0cca8c77f
A babys stick figure is just as equally art as another common hyper realistic eye.
I feel more joy seeing art that isn't perfect than seeing same old hyper realism.
As you can tell I kinda hate hyper realistic art.
Like we don't say people who commissioned art created it, so why does it count just because the machine won't dispute the claim?
It’s a real way to know that it’s yours, and no one else’s.
Make it make sense.
Best way to stop something like this, is literally to piss off the ones who use it.
Practice was also included in your humanity but apparently not good taste.
AI makes it so everyone can make(?) images... not the same as making art.
I don’t think consent is needed because I think this is fair use.
Ai bros are just weak and cowards. Everyone can learn to art, idiot
Folks that fawn over AI don’t want to “make art”, they want to “generate success/revenue/clot from art” without doing the god damn work.
That’s what it boils down to every, single, time.
And that stuck with me forever. I'm not a "good artist". But I still love to draw because of that mindset.
I mean sure it can be a bit of a drag at times(bless crtl+z), but it feels amazing when start to overcome the hard stuff and then you can see your progress from year to year <3
The problem I have with AI art, is that any edgy teenager with a bit of software can now pump out countless of images per day without any effort and call it "art".
And yes, AI art does look nice.
Meanwhile real artists drown in it and disappear from view.
It's just more of the same.
AI cannot create, just copy and scramble.
https://principiadiscordia.com/book/70.php
half of me still thinks it’s a LARP. they’re acting like they’re andy warhol because their cyberpunk landscape watercolor only took three prompt attempts.
And they give each other compliments like "Great expression and cat stare".
Jeebus.
There are countless books and YT videos that will show you the techniques more thoroughly than many art schools. It's not necissarily going to make you a Picasso or Leonardo, but you can definitely learn.
Plus the fails AI produces are hilarious.
anyroad, there's every potential for diffusion models, LLMs, and other ML tools to be amoral tools just like pen and paper, at which point there is definitely a strong accessibility argument for ML-assisted art
Have some consideration for us wretches barely existing here
"I want to make art, but I don't want to know how to make art"
I have to stop myself from throwing my laptop across the village
they think all artists are 1% billionares who dont need to work to live
Because I have been trying to learn how to draw at 40, and it is definitely a challenge. A beautiful one, but a challenge.
Artist: OK, but did they forget how?
Palaeolithic Art - Stone Age man may have used AI claims online billionaire psychopath.
*still makes art*
yeah people didn't need AI for this...
Yeah well neither can AI, what's your point?
sooooo cool…