when wikipedia launched, the idea that an encyclopedia could be reliably maintained by the public was a joke. now, it's a marvel, a remarkable resource, virtually the only website that remotely delivers on its potential and practically the last pleasant browsing experience on the internet.
Comments
Don’t ever cite the encyclopedia.
But if the encyclopedia’s got a bibliography you try and track down the relevant things cited THERE and boom, now you have primary sources.
And they’re always so blown away, lol
Just a friendly reminder, that Encyclopedia Britanica is also avail free, online, too!🙏💙💙🥰
https://www.britannica.com/science/chronic-fatigue-syndrome
Bad times, they were, bad times.
After that, there's a list, but it depends how bad that fire is...
Yeah man, def check the sources, but I guarantee you the Library of Alexandria had books about how to turn lead into gold and ward off evil spirits, so you know, pobody's nerfect.
Henry Clay is my daddy.
"Also buy twitter blue, you freeloader."
It provides a better overall understanding of a single topic (or multiple topics if one so chooses).
https://open.substack.com/pub/100daysofnetworks/p/day-5-of-100daysofnetworks?r=du0vp&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
But most libertarians are wilful assholes who just want to get their own way so it doesn’t work.
It forces you to drop your ego and try judge things fairly.
also it pays geniuses at charity scale, so they stay a few years then go to the big co's. we think of it as sending spies^Wambassadors out into the world (muwahaha)
I just set up a recurring $5 a month donation. That's a cup of fancy coffee a month.
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/12754/10720