If you’re not a law nerd, and you’re wondering why people who are not themselves theocratic fascists would support theocratic fascists, it’s to achieve this: to limit the power of the regulatory state.
Reposted from
Revolving Door Project
NEW: SCOTUS could soon overturn the "Chevron doctrine," upending numerous federal regulations designed to protect the public.
At least 20 right-wing groups linked to court-whisperers like Charles Koch and Leonard Leo have backed the assault on Chevron.
therevolvingdoorproject.org/amicus-spotl...
At least 20 right-wing groups linked to court-whisperers like Charles Koch and Leonard Leo have backed the assault on Chevron.
therevolvingdoorproject.org/amicus-spotl...
Comments
Answer: They can *sell* you mifepristone.
But they *hate* unions.
The FAA: who is more likely to know most about aviation? A judge? Or an "unelected bureaucrat" - who happened to spend their previous career in aviation?
Or the CDC. Again, who do you want setting health policy and approving medications? Judges or epidemiologists?
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N2PY2F7/
But as you've said, the setting of the regulations by the legislature would have to actually function.
but to be clear the real goal here is for corporations and right wingers to bog down federal governance and reform across an ocean of fronts in perpetual legal gridlock
But maybe that's just me?
(This is one of those "if it actually worked" things. If "AI" worked, it could 'read' 10,000 pages of rules and tell you if you were breaking them. But as the NY legal "AI" proved, it DOES NOT WORK.)
https://bsky.app/profile/jvagle.me/post/3kusqnxicbz2a
Then I started practicing and encountered judges in the wild for the first time.
A system of law under which arguably bad regulations can be challenged > rulership by whim and decree.
1/2
It will be far worse if he wins a second term.