What a petty little bitch. It must be a requirement for the Trump DoJ.
Reposted from
Ari Drennen
The Trump DOJ is big mad about their finest legal minds being humiliated in court
Comments
Now, whether the chief judge allows it, that's a different question.
All sprouts from the EO.
But he’s super interested in decorum and respect for the judicial process.
He and his purported client, Trump.
Fuck these people.
Yes, I do mean THESE people…
Like, if you aren't emailing it, fucking pick up a pen.
But this is the first administration for which, if I find out a lawyer worked for them, the presumption is that they're ethically shit & should be shunned.
It's the ones who were appointed into position you can be certain they suck.
a "rhetorical exercise" with "no legitimate judicial purpose"
Utterly pathetic. What a punk
She was telling you that the merits are blatant and you better have a better argument on the trial date than what you rolled up with.
Seems...circular?
I get that sometimes judges can make calls that are a bit head-scratching, but it’s mostly treated as…
But WTF is this? The deference is always the other way around. Attorneys don’t complain about *judges* decorum.
Three whole pages just to scream “it’s not FAIR!”
And if the chief judge does, I'm CERTAIN theu won't react badly to a lack of candor...