I feel the same way about ai music. Maybe it will be able to make something that approximates a good song at some point but the second I learn it was created by a thing that can't experience loss or joy or whatever it immediately becomes uninteresting by definition
Reposted from
rax ‘levon honkers’ king
the problem with a story, essay, etc written by LLM is that i lose interest as soon as you tell me that’s how it was made. i have yet to see one that’s ‘good’ but i don’t doubt the tech will soon be advanced enough to write ‘well.’ but i’d rather see what a person thinks and how they’d phrase it
Comments
Now think the same thing, but with art.
You’re right though
But I wouldn’t listen to that crap either
This can never , ever happen to AI.
I think AI has made the inverse of that obvious to me: Anything not created by humans is not art.
How cool would it be if they could turn the song in their head into an actual song even if they were disabled or rural or lived in a place it wasn't legal?
That is not a problem that AI solves.
Making it easier and more accessible for people to express their creativity is definitely a problem that they can solve
(Other than: here’s a prompt, now write my music for me)
Just need ethical AI dataset training rules
I personally don’t find anything innovative about taking other humans out of the loop, but to each their own
I have no interest in what AI “thinks”, I’m interested in what YOU think.
And they still use it and I still catch it and the world gets a little more boring.
You don't have to like where things are headed, but you do have to accept it as a probable reality.
A perfect example of this (though he wasn't criticizing AI, necessarily), is Bo Burnham's "Country Song."
https://youtu.be/y7im5LT09a0?si=cZ4rYRJzFJV_07Mf
If I'm eating food and a cockroach crawls out of it, I'm not finishing that meal, and it would most definitely affect how I felt about what I'd already eaten.