The AI madness is so far out of control that "Our product wrote a completely false news alert and credited a real news source" doesn't even rate a corporate comment, let alone an ashamed apology and pulling the product https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd0elzk24dno
Comments
OK THEN YOUR PRODUCT SUCKS. It's unreliable and shouldn't be on the market!
Discussions & guidelines are urgently needed over what’s AI’s proper role in news reporting.
https://www.npr.org/2024/09/20/nx-s1-5120581/three-mile-island-nuclear-power-plant-microsoft-ai
A little word that makes all the difference in the world.
Like a very small-sized statement within footnotes nobody cares about until a lawyer is required 😅
game set match lol
Why is it doing this, stay in your lane
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov
https://bsky.app/profile/katestarbird.bsky.social/post/3ldbqvepct22c
Used to be a most trusted news source. Not since Robbie was engaged.
Also: Why doesn't Apple just give news reports of the headlines? That's what a headline is for.
Same thing.
Letting AI write entire news articles is the logical next step for companies looking to cut corners for profit.
But there is an icon telling the user this is an AI summary, not the actual copy of a news story.
Just multiple levels of BS to wade through in this explanation.
Concatenate the original 3 headlines; or
Require the editors to provide 2 heds per story, one normal, one as short as possible & use the short ones in the notification; or
Have a human write the notification
As an R guy surely you know distant outliers do not represent the entire dataset.
we need to bring that shit back
Imagine it was your lawyer using it:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2023/06/08/lawyer-used-chatgpt-in-court-and-cited-fake-cases-a-judge-is-considering-sanctions/
https://www.opb.org/article/2024/12/09/artificial-intelligence-local-news-oregon-ashland/