For months, I have been posting that "Moms For Liberty" was neither composed of "moms" nor "for liberty".
It turns out that I was right. The founder of "Moms for Liberty" is (a) a guy, (b) who is a registered sex offender, and (c) claims that he was framed.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/imagine-that-5
It turns out that I was right. The founder of "Moms for Liberty" is (a) a guy, (b) who is a registered sex offender, and (c) claims that he was framed.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/imagine-that-5
Comments
the right wing fascist machine provides that.
That's a special kind of wingnut all on its own.
Not only that, but the only people that should be allowed to vote were those that owned land.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association
The founders of the national organization have their own problems.
So many so god dam many people shouting wouldn't somebody thing of kids turn out to be biggest harm
https://newrepublic.com/article/159662/libertarian-walks-into-bear-book-review-free-town-project
Either he is there by deception which means the organisation is piss poor
Or
They know he is a he & are covering for a convicted criminal who should not be within 10 miles of a child?
I’m guessing pedophilia while libertarian