People will really yell at you if you suggest AI models should pay for a license to all the works they ingest and cite their sources in their answers. I think it’s in part bc they believe in the magic of a machine intelligence. But we see more and more undeniable examples of straight up copying.
1 / 2
Comments
Which isn't great but better than an outright hallucination, I think
Here's the free ChatGPT. 4 out of 5 ain't bad.
4 out of 5 is still wrong when you're passing it off as an authority.
It doesn't know anything.
If you ask it when Easter is, it might tell you the correct date for this year or next year, but if you then tell it that's wrong, it'll start throwing out similarly formatted letter/number combinations.
Normally a LLM will blend together all it knows about a topic, but if it only knows one thing that's what you'll get.
Not, I think, for fiction, and the latter mainly for verification, not credit.
Flagrant plagiarism is dealt with when it happens; not in case it might.
https://bsky.app/profile/sinboy.bsky.social/post/3ks35z43wnx2q
I mean they can fully produce copies of things but from it's point of view it's not referencing any particular thing.
(And you may have seen what happens when you ask for references *in* the output )
https://bsky.app/profile/sababausa.bsky.social/post/3kmgbnmmx2p2t
Lawyers will work on both sides for as long as they can, because that is how they earn money. They do not really care about morals in this, they care about doing their job. If this is over quickly, less money. Makes no sense.
Citing sources, providing compensation, such gestures of considering the people who actually produce things ruins the experience of mindless consumption for them.
This could be a MAJOR problem.