I thought these stats from ChatGPT were interesting. Onshore Wind Generetion can be the cost effective. The obvious response to his trying to shut down wind, is why is he picking winners and losers? He said he wouldn’t.
If there are any experts who want to challenge the numbers pls do.
If there are any experts who want to challenge the numbers pls do.
Comments
&
https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2024/fossil_energy_technologies
Generally I like to avoid ChatGPT for numerical questions since it, like any LLM, doesn’t have deductive synthesis capabilities. Sourcing studies and still reigns king.
offshore wind makes no economic sense without government subsidies. It’s too expensive to deploy and maintain. You may need it because of climate related factors but end-user power costs will be high.
Green power and green fuel have a win-win relationship. If there is am excess of wind you can make green fuel rather than dumping the power.
Green fuel does all the things EVs can't. Elon would be so mad if you went after trucks.
https://youtu.be/OU9nhnSOhxs?si=mb5LEEcRb0GWoYko
https://globalwindatlas.info/en/
1. You must assume you think climate change is irrelevant / not a short-term problem
Some voters hear “your families are in obsolete industries, and we’ll kill them for good with policy.”
Once again, an example of politicking that has bifurcated effectiveness among the electorate
Wind 1.5 cent kwh
Solar 2.5 cent kwh
Offshore around 4.5 cent
Gas & oil 6 cent kwh
Gas and oil will increase the others going down.
Electrification is another big factor .
I personally think it will be much more but I go with official numbers.
As of 2025, California generates 61% of its electricity from non-fossil-fuel sources. This includes 39% from renewable sources like solar and wind, with the remainder coming from large hydro and nuclear power.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2022-total-system-electric-generation
https://calmatters.org/environment/climate-change/2024/08/california-clean-power-progress-grid/
as of 2025, how much electricity does california generate from renewable sources
I disagree. The oasis might be a mirage, but we need to keep going.
We will find it in the end.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/09/trump-asks-oil-executives-campaign-finance-00157131
How the heck do we do that, tho'?!?
Rebuild one person at a time.
It becomes catching if done well, though it’s a slow & painful slog.
👀 Post-Hitler Germany reprogramming.
One only misses what was lost.
Education is step 1. Make science sexy without diminishing it. It is and should be.
We need to flip the house & senate.
The Democratic Party needs to hold daily briefings and appoint an opposition leader
We are the watchdogs! don’t forget the trillions of dollars he is spending is funded by us.
A wind guy could pay Trump, he wouldn’t reverse his tune.
regulations.
solar + batteries are each on track to reach cost of materials
Of course its cheaper, and will get cheaper the more that is developed.
Trump is a dinosaur and so are his supporters, they want to go back to manual labour and mining / drilling our resources.
I know for a fact that Rockport Missouri is completely powered by wind
https://www.kansascityhiker.com/waypoints/rock-port-missouri-wind-farm
So love watching them spin
they're constantly presenting "facts" which are the absolute antithesis of what is actually happening
It's clearly a-scientific cronyism.
If past 50 yrs were spent on R&D we'd have tiny generators 4 every home (run by its own refuse + an indigenous source whether water, wind, or sun).
Same way yrs of R&D gave huge memory storage in tiny chips.
Independent off-the-grid population. Ooh scary.
Or that Ocycontin was not addictive .
Follow the money u will always get the answer .
https://open.substack.com/pub/williamtaggart/p/looking-back-on-ercot-2024?r=1a0mow&utm_medium=ios
Common term is "the winter problem"
I have heard of interesting pump solutions, big air bags anchored to the sea floor. Cheaper than building reservoirs.
The key is a 'secondary' buyer if grid has no demand
https://youtu.be/axTvYk3f1D4?si=ckVQYqf_YvyqrA-x
Freenvesting on YouTube
Most people have no ideal what’s about to happen.
Watch this guy this is one of his videos see others as well
Need to find red staters with dirty jeans & calloused hands to sing its praises. It’s all perception.
Full statement here:
https://www.change.org/WeThePeople-DemandActionNow
When windmills are idle because there's no wind, they often can generate electricity and sell it to the grid using internal natural gas generators instead of wind. (yes.)
So what may be behind Trump's >
I asked him why Warren Buffet was suddenly all 'windmills, windmills, windmills' and he said something like "warren is long on natural gas, and he and his buddies were able to get NG 'in' with windmills."
This guy also said he himself hated >
We don’t have natural gas generators in our turbines.
https://www.livescience.com/oldest-climate-record-ever-cenozoic-era.html
"Using less energy is really important in the fight against climate change."
Good thing I burned some coal just to get that answer.
Not often he isn't
https://bsky.app/profile/rickabright.bsky.social
https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/european-electricity-review-2025/
And not afraid to tackle big problems. I just don’t get some of these posts. Other than maybe he’s goading the Dems to get tougher, which would be good.
Green energy initiatives, which are clean and sustainable, don’t produce greenhouse gases or other pollutants. Our conversion to solar, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal solutions would eat into their profits.
https://youtu.be/7fkMR96I0sw?si=6MwxGMdeSJYrdS9n
He has now been confirmed as Secretary of Defense by our Senate. He is a right wing extremist who wants to attack progressives and democracy itself.
Why is this not being talked about???
We have some voices that know the subject & could contribute to his convo.
It's right up there with, "He doesn't really mean it, wait and see."
He is evil incarnate.
Not saying wind is bad, just believe it is better as a live and passive power source used in real time.
No one wants AI. They are only shoving it on us because they invested so much.
Signed, https://www.costplusdrugs.com
#1 priority is lowering costs for all Americans
We should do so in a way that’s environmentally friendly, accessible, diverse, equitable, etc etc
But if policies don’t benefit Americans economically then we aren’t going to get the votes to win.
Now the war on the truth engages and gets smarter under AI 🤖
Then, power lines are super expensive.
It literally makes sense for Japan to import green fuel from Australia vs put up local turbines.
https://youtu.be/n1Ongj7DN3o?si=g9soZ5R7etiy42M0
#EatTheRich #FootballLifestyle
EVERY. SINGLE. ONE
Since one third of the S&P and 50% of 2024 gains are in AI associated MAG7 stocks any thoughts on how Chinese AI like ByteDance and DeepSeek change the world?
Will you be switching from. ChatGPT?
Will US protectionism extend to AI if they're not the frontrunners?
https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-fossil-fuel-subsidies-a-closer-look-at-tax-breaks-and-societal-costs#:~:text=Conservative%20estimates%20put%20U.S.%20direct,natural%20gas%20and%20crude%20oil.
https://youtu.be/ec9P3C1OXqE?si=kMIJp-ynLnq3vs6y
With a national grid, you need surprisingly small amounts of batteries.
5-hour batteries are almost sufficient for Australia:
https://bsky.app/profile/davidosmond.bsky.social/post/3lch46cu3cc2l
https://www.snexplores.org/article/green-energy-cheaper-than-fossil-fuels-climate
He’s against wind power because he’s racketeering / blackmailing / owned by the fossil fuel industry. Don’t anger the Saudis. He won’t start over to schmooze new folks
He's just a salesnan. A spokesmodel
I appreciate you trying thou, cuz I'm a little busy rn...
If these fuckers actually deserved their wealth, they would've been smart converting to renewables in the 80's, a path Carter had us on. Instead, they want fascism because that they believe is safe, and history shows the opposite.
The rest of the world is trying to save the planet , Trump is trying to lick the doors and pretend it’s not happening, Drill Drill
drill. Why ?
3rd party oppos who use the campaign, not to win, big as a messeging PR, have undermined the forward movment of our democracy a few too many times
Nader cost us 25 years of environmental progress & legislation. Nader said later on, 2000 was his biggest regret
Not named Bush..
It also has the unsolved problem of long-term waste storage. The earth moves, water flows, etc, and it’s not possible to say that anyplace is a safe storage place.
Also, often private operators leave the clean-up costs to the gov.
The outcome is still the same. Oil is dying, economies based on oil are going to be history.
Of the 2024 electricity in Germany, 62.7 was from renewable energy. After phasing nuclear out, they are still adjusting though, they imported quite a lot of electricity last year.
https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/the-grid/wind-and-solar-power-need-additional-transmission-lines/
When discussing the cost of different energy production, are they accounting for the loss in transmission?
And I don’t trust any politician to have their own thoughts on this topic. I’m sure they’re just regurgitating what the last lobbyist told them.
Who is getting paid for the focus on oil, how and how much?
Trump doesn't like wind generation because they disrupted his view at his golf course in Scotland. Scotland Supreme Court and the UK told him to piss off.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_International_Golf_Club_Scotland_Ltd_v_The_Scottish_Ministers
1. Onshore vs. Offshore Costs
• Onshore Wind:
• As you mentioned, unsubsidized onshore wind would still need power purchase agreements (PPAs) at prices 3–4 times higher than traditional power generation (e.g., natural gas or coal).
Bear withe me.
Offshore wind, especially in its current state, is still significantly more expensive than both traditional power sources and even onshore renewables when subsidies are removed. Here’s a clearer breakdown, reflecting your point:
That said the ChatGPT is plainly false.
https://www.lazard.com/media/xemfey0k/lazards-lcoeplus-june-2024-_vf.pdf
He is nothing more than a petulant child and every single opinion or “policy” is a result of some perceived slight or grievance.
Problem one was believing anything he says. Trump has demonstrated that he is unaware of the difference between the truth and a lie. There is only speech, and it either gets him what he wants or not. That's it.
Did something contrary to what he say?
Just business Mark
Just doing good business
It’s only as good as what the LLM can read.
#misinformation #skewednews #relyonatyourownrisk
#poisonedwaterhole
Better source:
https://www.desmog.com/
Secondarily, Mark why would you believe anything The Felon says?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/donald-trump-scotland-abandon-monstrous-wind-farm-plans-flna734664
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-47400641
And, yes, he's picking winners and losers. When did he say he wouldn't?
I think he'll always put his fingers on the scales. If it benefits him: good. If not, bad. If it's neutral, ignore it.
Steal technology, get virtual monopolies and suppress competing technologies: this is corporatism.
Trump supporting that which already reins isn't surprising
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2464408-air-monitoring-station-records-biggest-ever-jump-in-atmospheric-co2/