once a year an elected Republican is like, "if my fellow Republicans expose all of my sex crimes I will be FORCED to expose all of THEIR sex crimes!" and at no point is the new york times ever like "huh this is a weird conversation to keep having"
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I'm unsure about Obama because he was an outsider but other than that we have *only* had "President Rapey McPedo" for as long as most Americans have been alive
"You might think the cumulative effect of GOP sex scandals would damage their brand. Here's why you would be wrong, and why it spells disaster for Dem...."--NYT
And these conversations also involve bills and projects made to cover the tracks of said elected Republican in desperation. A lot of them involve any attempt to ban porn and making the lives of the working class as miserable as they are.
1. admitting you are involved in sex crimes
2. Admitting there are MANY others involved in sex crimes
at one point i thought being involved in sex crimes would mean you would resign your elected position in shame, but now it is just a tuesday. Now it is part of the GOP brand
I bet this is JUST NOT TRUE that if you bothered to search the ny times or could find a timesperson to aks you would find that the times has in fact had multiple stories on this and you are just not bothering to read
this is because the top brass of the new york times (and the rest of the ny media) are perpetrators of the same crimes so they’d rather not draw too much attention to the subject
This is how you know there’s no such thing as a liberal media because even a non partisan outlet that was just in it for the clicks would be all over this like fire ants
Maybe if they catch a woman doing sex crimes they'll be more interested in it.
May I take this moment to remind us that of the potentially hundreds of men who participated in the Epstein sex trafficking ring of female children it is only a woman who has been convicted.
I'm willing to bet Republican sex crimes are a bit like crypto- no one person has all the information, its vast and won't break the system if one goes down, and even as it gets more valuable and tangible there's a lot of people ignoring it.
Its supposed to be decentralized so that if one person got hacked all the data is already spread into chunks and that one person you hacked was useless.
"strange that a number of representatives keep strongly implying they belong to a cabal of sex criminals who use knowledge about each others crimes to enforce silence and political obedience. but that would be bad!!"
It's of note that every major neo nazi group who is involved in organized crime has done human trafficking and sex crimes.
It's baked into white supremecy. So even the average red hat Maga who doesn't think he's a white supremacist but buys into the system anyway is gonna have an inkling toward it
NYT: "Brave Republican member of Congress promises to blow the whistle on their own party's crimes. Why isn't a Democrat House member willing to do the same?"
Everytime a justice department concludes an investigation - some creep loses the chance to carry on with his brutal disgusting behaviour
Isn't that right Clarence!!!
honestly the most memorable thing about him was the radish harmer joke about how he paralyzed a gay man. also that was the least objectionable thing about him
Comments
"Why aren't Democrats having sex? Republicans keep partying, while out of touch Democrats have become the party of stick-in-the-muds"
Weird that this is a common occurence.
https://youtu.be/PQzLCHLle-g?si=Oa0AD5ZXvQ-JYE09
2. Admitting there are MANY others involved in sex crimes
at one point i thought being involved in sex crimes would mean you would resign your elected position in shame, but now it is just a tuesday. Now it is part of the GOP brand
I mean, do they even get a perfunctory call from law enforcement?
May I take this moment to remind us that of the potentially hundreds of men who participated in the Epstein sex trafficking ring of female children it is only a woman who has been convicted.
It's just powerful men abusing power. Not legislative or economic power. Just power over young people to whom they have access.
It's baked into white supremecy. So even the average red hat Maga who doesn't think he's a white supremacist but buys into the system anyway is gonna have an inkling toward it
Isn't that right Clarence!!!