I think organizing an event, having an entire multi-step screening process, sending out invitations, doing STI tests for everyone involved ahead of time, and gathering data for a planned substack article is actually setting some world records for consent
Seems pretty successful to me given that the point of a gangbang is to get banged by a lot of dudes. How many of those dudes cum is an interesting but ultimately irrelevant data point
for this volume of people, if someone told me every participant came, I'd know they were lying and had never been to a gangbang this big
the penetrators get very little time to cum, probably no more than a couple minutes if there's 37 of them. 4 minutes each = 2.5 continuous hours for the receiver
A lot of it is probably dudes thinking they're prepping beforehand and then realizing that blasting rope at home right before has made them much less able to blast rope at the event.
That's my educated guess from working in sexual health.
There's a good reason why there actually aren't that many male pornstars, even when you account for most porn being watched by straight men. It's not something you can just do by simply wanting to have sex a lot.
Okay this is why I love BlueSky. Come across a jokey post about a gangbang cum rate and get some insight into why the cum rate is usually low. Not sure what to do with this information, but glad I learned something today!
if it's your first time, this sort of environment is very different from every other time you've ever had sex and there's a lot of people implicitly judging you
I remember reading a pornstar interview in a Maxim/Stuff magazine and one of them talk about how you really need to be fine with masturbating in front of a crew that is anxious for you to finish because they're on a schedule and I was "Hmmm, yeah that doesn't sound fun."
Yeah seconding this. Through my twenties I had this experience w a lot of guys and was worried I was… very bad at sex, lmao. But like women, guys often don’t come the first time w a new partner! And that’s okay!
When I saw this I assumed you were talking about the woman who got a bloody nose at the Arnold Strongman Classic during her deadlift, and boy was this a surprise.
I've actually seen it a couple times at the qualifiers, at least. but the olympic lifts tend to be a little lower weight than, like, a max effort deadlift that really stresses the pelvic floor
This is reminding me of when Molleena Williams-Haas said she spends half her time in them reassuring all the male participants that their particular dick is, in fact, the best dick ever, much better than that other guy's dick over there.
Don't get me wrong, the vibes here seem rancid, but I feel like lots of guys have had a sexual encounter where they weren't able to cum and it's really not that uncommon
Honestly I think that sounds like an amazingly high percentage of successful completions, especially considering it was probably 100% a combination of redditors and people that pay for multiple onlyfans
Comments
😭😭😭
-elections
-opinion polling
-infrastructure
topics that do not need this level of data journalism:
-OP
the penetrators get very little time to cum, probably no more than a couple minutes if there's 37 of them. 4 minutes each = 2.5 continuous hours for the receiver
Also I just stared at my phone for like 45 seconds trying to make a “datajizz” pun.
Good for you Aella!
That's my educated guess from working in sexual health.
🎵It's not unusual to not cum at an orgy🎵
https://bsky.app/profile/bomgaars.bsky.social/post/3kmo2ihqc7v2a
1 - Nelson Mandela epigraph.
2 - Congrats to this guy losing his V card while wearing a heart rate monitor.
She got to make a cool chart about the event, and maybe that's what she wanted all along.