Folks, arguing if Musk can/will actually remove the "block" feature on his service is good sport, but also I think misses the point that Musk's clear and unambiguous intent is to, one way or another, make the service absolutely unsafe for anyone who's not his favorite flavor of fascist shitweasel
Comments
https://twitter.com/underthesea62/status/1692658532926079228?t=EV_qO9Azyjt5UR8WRwri-A&s=09
But xwitter is so far down the rabbit hole of catering to CHUDs that it can't make that pivot.
That's why I didn't want to be too sure about what they meant.
Not the gotcha people think it is, then.
Though if that is the point then he’s doing an outstanding job!
In my head canon, it was an effective grassroots organizing platform and he wanted it dismantled because he’s more in favor of a return to feudalism.
But I do agree with your analysis of how he ended up there.
He just doesn’t care. About anything.
Or he's a petulant man child just having a tantrum while screaming I AM THE SMARTEST MAN or some such lol...
but it's a bad tick to take everyone he says as fact. So many articles written up now with headlines about what Elon said. You'd think we'd learn after four years of Trump.
Fascist shitweasel
Begone, for Scalzi is the
Fucknuckle Scarecrow
https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/
The way that's written, it doesn't seem like a user block is intended because a user block doesn't block a person from the service.
He's chasing away all the users except the ones who will lick his boots until they're out of spit, at which point I guess (I HOPE) his $44B experiment in digital neo-fascism will conclude?
Eliminate privacy, fuck user safety and make X a nasty little hub of creepy little Nazi shits as fast as possible - that’s the business plan.