The Times has to issue a correction here. An Executive order can’t “require” any such thing. Calling it ‘an aggressive push to catch” fraud is bad editorial judgment. The first part is demonstrably false. Those who have any voice to the Times need to demand this. Might as well say pigs fly.
Reposted from
The New York Times
President Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday that will require proof of U.S. citizenship on election forms. The move is in an aggressive push to catch and combat voter fraud, which is exceedingly rare but constantly cited by Trump as a reason he lost the 2020 election.
Comments
[Four paragraphs later]
Trump stood behind podium flapping his arms achieving nothing.
Best thing for people to do is set their minds to destroying both of those rags...and LA Times too.
That’s what he’s been doing. That’s why there are so many court cases
Constitution first;
Federal law second;
Federal regulations implementing laws, third;
Exec Orders, last
vice-versa, close, keep FFS
on and on and on....
When they do day anything remotely negative about him, it's mealy mouthed and below the fold
EOs have the force of law.
Executive agencies interact with elections.
Not complying will be the basis for legally withholding funding.
Be clear eyed and stop spreading misinformation. This has the force of law. We need to fight it as a law.
Democrats would never vote for someone so horrible that want to put Transgender women in men's prison so thet could rape and kill them.
Democrats listen to Democrat Hillary Clinton when she warned us not to vote for Traitor Donald Trump. There was no voter fraud. Trump lost the election to Republican Joe Biden because of the racist gerrymandering in the red states.
https://youtu.be/oZf7IASx2mE?si=n0fdwTHpM5hkI-VX
https://youtu.be/jThAZVpyXNY?si=tUxG_eItlXyVr-zG
Blood on your hands, @nytimes.com
Something we don't need today.
Nobody sees this part? Correct me if I'm wrong but tRump has never openly said he lost the election no?
#NoToTyranny
The institutions will note save us.
Rarely is any of it true.
Only State legislatures and Congress and the can modify ID requirements or how elections are administered
I hope you're right!
Thank you New York Times for our first dictator. You are complicit.
The Times issues a correction—bam! It’s framed as an admission of guilt.
Next move? The Felon-in-Chief sues for hundreds of millions.
The ending? A $10–15M settlement and a victory lap on cable news.
Grift level: expert.
This is impossible as more states have vote by mail.
Look, when the people vote, Republicans lose. Therefore, Republicans must make sure the people can't vote.
[email protected]
https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-Submit-a-Letter-to-The-Editor
Managing through E.O.’s is worthless.
...
...
...
DON'T.
You're essentially saying that they're being dishonest for reporting the truth because you don't like how they presented it?
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
Reality - Trump - law breaking, anti-American, unethical, grifts off of the public, impeachable offenses.
But likely not.
WHY ARE YOU SURPRISED??
THEY ARE FREQUENTLY BEFUDDLED!!
So you CAN register & vote w/o official ID. Not great honestly
It's not that hard, NYT.
"President Trump Issues Yet Another Illegal Unconstitutional Order"
Plz let me know if I'm off base 🙏
A) they can (and would) make a much starker moral statement regarding such a proclamation, and
B) "Murder is illegal" is basic Common Law, "the president can't control state elections" is a somewhat complex, caveated aspect of our particular system. AFAIU
With a strong enough trebuchet, and for a very short period of time... 🤔
However, a journalist or publisher who wants to be taken seriously can be expected to report the actual facts that are known at the time of publication.
Per the EO, that’s required to be able to use a driver’s license.
It only matters that those with the power to require such things in each state follow his directions. What are you going to do? Annul 10 elections?
Its content is for anti-Trump educated types who aren't ever going to accept this. Still, its reporting tempers readers' outrage. It's extremely insidious
They're not going to stop being garbage anytime soon.
The Times is Fox News for smart people. Otherwise smart people keep making excuses for them.
They helped create this mess. They are not and never will be a reliable partner to end it.
it's so hard to keep up
1) they'd ever retract this
2) if might not be a willful lie
*please stop pretending it's incompetence*
GOVERNMENT!
They are defrauding our government!!🤬
They are now going after our sacred votes!!🤬
#ArrestAndIndictMusk🐀
#RemoveTrumpAndHisGangsterTODAY
👇👀
https://youtu.be/afww0tF7DY0?feature=shared
See, that's not really that difficult a sentence to write!
Don't get me started ....
https://youtu.be/1DWiB7ZuLvI?si=G_m0XIe9n2dn2ik_
Mike Johnson (202) 225-2777
John Thune (202) 224-2321
Chuck Schumer (202) 224-6542
Hakeem Jefferies (202) 225-5936
Call for impeachment or treason charges. Use 5calls.org if you need help.
Every lede has got to start with "An executive order, which is no more than a proclamation and not a law, ..."