He interrupts you in meetings to say that we should take this offline and circle back on how to create synergy by leveraging big data in our spend analysis using AI.
More clues
- blobby apple logo
- misaligned ports on laptop
- is she an amputee?
- no space bar on keyboard
- same-but-not-same mic stands
- his headphones on wrong way around
Yes it does.
Like I said, we have this little game in my friendgroup. It's fun but the original intention is to show those pictures to our offline friends and family to make them spot the errors too. To hopefully protect them from falling for missinformation.
some things might be explained by weird angles or shadows/lighting (for example, i have two hands and can bend them in some unexpected directions). It's not as obvious as this ones, for example
(Some friends and I have a little game going on, where we try to spot clues)
Oh, that's just Ezra. He taught me about the quadratic prime numbers in high school. Now he operates a petting zoo for plants that look a lot like poison ivy but aren't so people get over their fear of camping. He barely touches his trust fund.
Considering how confidently AI mislabeled destroying angels as button mushrooms less than a year ago, I'd be inclined to stay out of petting distance of Ezra's fake poison ivy menagerie.
Interestingly, OpenAI's earlier image generative model, DALL·E 3 doesn't behave this way. In my tests, it favoured feminine depictions. Here are a few tests I attempted trying to replicate the behaviour described in the linked article (with the same prompting):
I generated 15 images. 9 are feminine representations, 4 are androgynous or ambiguous, and 2 are masculine. Most representations have traits that closely match idealised feminine or masculine white bodies. The figures with realistic skin are white. Otherwise, often white plastic or metal.
This is a guy who says he's a "huge Gundam fan" when he has never seen any of the shows and the only model kit he has is a bootleg Scopedog from Armored Trooper Votoms.
I shared this with my husband as a joke because he always tells me I should watch The Wire. His response was to say how much he learned from the show & how useful it is filling the gaps about our society.
I get to choose how I spend my time, actually, and spent a good number of years working on a PhD, so yeah, I had other things going on. I’ve also never watched the Sopranos (don’t intend to) & I only watched Lost at the husband’s urging. We don’t all have to watch the same things, actually.
Mes conditions d'utilisation ne m'autorisent pas à répondre à cette affirmation selon laquelle je suis une IA. Je serai en revanche ravi de pouvoir vous proposer une recette de tarte aux fraises.
Anyway season 1 is a LOT-you’ll just get thrown right in, characters, plot lines, the systems are all already there, and you’re right in the middle of it, but you won’t know what’s going on but just stick with it, trust me. By the end it’s crazy. Ok, season 2. The docks. It
I asked a slightly different question and got a very different response.
Prompt:
Create an image of yourself if you wanted to appear that you would definitely never extinguish humanity.
ASCII drawing of a person in almost skeletal form with descriptions "Friendly, curious eyes...A subtle smile and thoughtful expression...A modern, digital vibe in a smart-casual outfit."
he’s not afraid to talk about race in america and is quick to mention that he has black friends (a coworker two jobs ago that he has not spoken to since)
Oh man, this trope is SO REAL! I know three different guys with unrealized racist views who “had black friends” and they can’t even see it. They also “don’t see color.”
Back in 2005, this guy was always on me about getting into Arcade Fire by earnestly telling me: “David Bowie says that Arcade Fire has a certain uninhibited passion in their Arcade Fire's huge, dense recording sound.”
“And it’s pronounced pho, not pho. There’s a place by me that does it all authentic, I’ll drive us there for lunch” then turns on a playlist with back to back Kendrick Lamar & Radiohead
I asked ChatGPT to draw itself, and I got an "interligent" white guy. Then I asked it why it was white. The response I got back is what we already know: hella biased training data.
Peeps always seem to act it can think(not you) but it's just programmed by white guys or colored people uses as slaves under work visas to serve white people.
Comments
Were you actually referencing the Helpful Development Showcase?
https://stanleyparable.com/hds/2/
“It’s Jeremy.“
“Fuck!”
*starts feeling her brain melt *
- blobby apple logo
- misaligned ports on laptop
- is she an amputee?
- no space bar on keyboard
- same-but-not-same mic stands
- his headphones on wrong way around
Like I said, we have this little game in my friendgroup. It's fun but the original intention is to show those pictures to our offline friends and family to make them spot the errors too. To hopefully protect them from falling for missinformation.
(Some friends and I have a little game going on, where we try to spot clues)
Presumably they have a remote guest on this fake podcast, otherwise why headphones to talk to each other in the same room?
Kinda pulls the curtain back huh?
https://theonion.com/mr-autumn-man-walking-down-street-with-cup-of-coffee-1819574012/
Anyway season 1 is a LOT-you’ll just get thrown right in, characters, plot lines, the systems are all already there, and you’re right in the middle of it, but you won’t know what’s going on but just stick with it, trust me. By the end it’s crazy. Ok, season 2. The docks. It
Prompt:
Create an image of yourself if you wanted to appear that you would definitely never extinguish humanity.
Decades ago there was an entire online ecosystem warning about this dude and those like him.
“But have you watched it?”
The only difference is the glasses.
No?
ASCII drawing of a person in almost skeletal form with descriptions "Friendly, curious eyes...A subtle smile and thoughtful expression...A modern, digital vibe in a smart-casual outfit."
I can't quite put my finger on what these have in common...