ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
jonbois.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
what do you all think of this post? let me know in the replies
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
kling.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Good but not great. It had substance but lacked pizzazz
1
reply
[–]
thekennedykab.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
This could be libelous.
5
reply
[–]
labbott.name
•
195 days ago
👍
0
reply
[–]
regbazile.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Actually…
0
reply
[–]
immortality.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
it's certainly one of the posts of all time
0
reply
[–]
casuallychaotic.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
0
reply
[–]
shorterpearson.com
•
195 days ago
It’s the kind of @jonbois.bsky.social content I’ve come to expect from the @jonbois.bsky.social account.
5
reply
[–]
kiwijr.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Pretty good but they are places you can still improve
0
reply
[–]
mstein609.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Never mind that, what do you think of this reply?
0
reply
[–]
xanderoconnor.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
fire
0
reply
[–]
tonycooper.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
lovely thanks
0
reply
[–]
sego.li
•
195 days ago
I believe you may not have been watching baseball while writing this one. however, I'm willing to be disproven regarding this matter.
0
reply
[–]
flamin-galah.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
it's a very post-y post
0
reply
[–]
ennui.org
•
195 days ago
I can't speak for all, sorry
3
reply
[–]
congressman.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Haven’t seen it
0
reply
[–]
uforika.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
disagree to agree
0
reply
[–]
pykeredrock.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It’s certainly one of the posts of all time.
1
reply
[–]
noodlesoop.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It's the most post that a post has ever posted, including that time that the post posted.
1
reply
[–]
nug.monster
•
195 days ago
i think it's offensive and frankly you should be ashamed.
0
reply
[–]
krisoverstreet.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Well, it's straight, but it's not particularly long. Wouldn't work well as part of a fence. Might work as a stake for tomato plants.
1
reply
[–]
gakoid.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
.5/18.268548.
1
reply
[–]
fearaveen.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
it’s definitely a post, you can’t argue that
0
reply
[–]
roomey95.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
My own Hobbes
0
reply
[–]
laddical.bsky.social
•
194 days ago
Is that what replies are for? Never quite got that.
0
reply
[–]
jpmatth.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
One of the posts of all time.
0
reply
[–]
tedcruznipples.com
•
195 days ago
I loved it
0
reply
[–]
kayefable.bsky.social
•
182 days ago
Mm, a hair confusing - I thought it was referring to another post at first! But maybe that's just me.
0
reply
[–]
axelak.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Mid
0
reply
[–]
bennyswitch.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I just like seeing Hobbes when I’m scrolling, so I’m glad this post is here.
0
reply
[–]
jayrigdon.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
not bad Jon
0
reply
[–]
boredompeejeterson.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
3/5, kinda mid, a bit funny but nothing I'd send to my friends.
0
reply
[–]
digitalgeist.com
•
195 days ago
Not too shabby. This is the kind of content Jon heads have come to expect.
6
1
reply
[–]
scarfface.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
i disagree. i wasn't expecting this.
7
reply
[–]
ahavw.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
What an interesting post! DM for financail opportunity.
5
reply
[–]
hotcornerharbor.com
•
195 days ago
can't see it, let me go boot up the fax machine to let the staff know
0
reply
[–]
kjcdb.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
🔥
0
reply
[–]
noahkittleson.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
pretty good! Keep it up
0
reply
[–]
bartikus.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Certainly a post of all time
0
reply
[–]
ary.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I like that it invites audience participation because that's me.
0
reply
[–]
bartholomewb.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Trenchant!
0
reply
[–]
bethanyrobison.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
One of your best, five 🌟
1
reply
[–]
maybe.fail
•
195 days ago
the lack of capital letters belies the importance of this timeless message
0
reply
[–]
iamalizard.neocities.org
•
195 days ago
Needs more salt
0
reply
[–]
dashdotott.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
[Statler and Waldorf, elderly muppets, going from hating it to indifferent to loving it dot gif]
0
reply
[–]
walkingjalopy.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
"a tour de force [that] redefines the genre" --me
1
reply
[–]
shredders.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It's alright, if you like that sort of thing
0
reply
[–]
diablorojo55.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I like the minimalist approach, very good.
0
reply
[–]
hinekosama.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It does seem very post-y. One might even say, that it's the epitome of a post. A definition. A model. Most post-y post ever posted.
5
reply
[–]
jm6k.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
very confusing but entertaining. a surreal experience. the most abstract thing i've ever seen.
0
reply
[–]
poondoom.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It tastes like shit
0
reply
[–]
l10n.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I can't see your post, but I hope it's sturdy and supports your fence for a lifetime.
6
reply
[–]
kyleor.land
•
195 days ago
it's fine
0
reply
[–]
cmu.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
3/10
0
reply
[–]
jamesonalford.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Out of all of the posts on here, it is one of them.
0
reply
[–]
gillmorgan70.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Need to reflect on it. Raises some challenging issues that need a proper response after proper thought
0
reply
[–]
blogsothoth.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I do not.
0
reply
[–]
ohtheprofanity.com
•
195 days ago
Fine
0
reply
[–]
tautologer.com
•
194 days ago
it's good
2
reply
[–]
possiblecabbage.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Needs more adverbs.
4
reply
[–]
siafu11.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Subscribe.
0
reply
[–]
susandathome.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Looks fine to me…
0
reply
[–]
isavogue.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
the worst post i've ever seen i fear
0
reply
[–]
carsonic.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I has been 9 hours, am I too late to respond? Thanks I'll take my answer off the air.
0
reply
[–]
catfrat.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I don’t know enough about your post to have an opinion but I’m mad about it
5
reply
[–]
timboehde.bsky.social
•
194 days ago
I've seen better
0
reply
[–]
buzzboy.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
One of my 10
0
reply
[–]
cstrable.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Good but I'm closed
0
reply
[–]
elmsandr.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Derivative of your earlier works.
0
reply
[–]
rocketamari.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
solid technique, especially tight on the follow-through, it's clear you've got your fundamentals down.
0
reply
[–]
deanosaur.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I don't know
1
reply
[–]
brubinow.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It's good but could be better, Jon!
0
reply
[–]
leerosenberg.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Too soon
0
reply
[–]
ewanspence.co.uk
•
195 days ago
Not sure, but I am looking forward to the analysis of the replies in 45 minute long video.
0
reply
[–]
alsmiff.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Absolutely fine
0
reply
[–]
decoyoctopus.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I’ve had better
0
reply
[–]
thatjimdavis.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It's on Bluesky, so i instantly knew it was going to have a happy beginning, middle and ending. If this was X, I'd be contractually obliged to accuse you of virtue signalling and compare you to the Nazi's.
0
reply
[–]
zepaw.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
2
reply
[–]
pdufray.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
This post fails to follow the AP Stylebook, believed by some
0
reply
[–]
witzkers.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I read the first half. Good so far
6
reply
[–]
fustbariclation.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Hoc? Propter ad hoc.
0
reply
[–]
elitecaster.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I'm givin it... A 7. ...out of 10.
0
reply
[–]
vyacho.bsky.social
•
194 days ago
i think it's very
0
reply
[–]
sorocchungus.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
yeah it’s pretty good, man. Keep up the great work, jon.
0
reply
[–]
oscar-riba.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Bait post?
0
reply
[–]
charloh.online
•
195 days ago
seems alright but not one of your best by a wife margin
HAHA we mean wide margin
but also,
11
reply
[–]
prolly-knott.bsky.social
•
193 days ago
Oh, you know, 14 words long, no capitals
0
reply
[–]
tatamize-jun.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
1
reply
[–]
bluebandanajake.bsky.social
•
194 days ago
I think its pretty okay
0
reply
[–]
christopherleone.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Good
1
reply
[–]
snowmonkey78.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I don’t reply to posts like this.
0
reply
[–]
alikchi.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I was expecting more.
0
reply
[–]
rockyruff.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It’s good Jon. Thanks for all the good times. More yet to come. 🙏🫶
0
reply
[–]
gavingough.com
•
195 days ago
I enjoyed it more than I’d expected.
0
reply
[–]
dadooron.bsky.social
•
194 days ago
Apart from the punctuation, it’s a solid 8.
0
reply
[–]
biestyoy.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
[Don Draper voice] I don’t think about this post at all
0
reply
[–]
petestaiano.com
•
195 days ago
0
reply
[–]
pieandpeas.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
I think there should be more of it. Can you post it again?
0
reply
[–]
myrafoxy.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
4/10, but it's not the US grading system so it's barely failing
0
reply
[–]
raymanwithaplan.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
when I saw this post, it made me make the jon bois noise
0
reply
[–]
doublefelix.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Sorry, didn't make it to the end...iarat
0
reply
[–]
elmapper.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Like what you see?
0
reply
[–]
tiredafterall.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Keep up the good work
1
reply
[–]
kingdonutthefirst.bsky.social
•
194 days ago
No.
0
reply
[–]
sorrycop.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Horkin 4 uppins. Respek
0
reply
[–]
blueberrymill.bsky.social
•
194 days ago
0
reply
[–]
aazzuy2.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
It's electric!
0
reply
[–]
callmeluna.com
•
195 days ago
It’s not bad, but you could probably fix it in post
0
reply
[–]
mxfee.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Mid, but that's ok
0
reply
[–]
forrishilier.bsky.social
•
194 days ago
Needs some more punctuation & a capital letter 😏
0
reply
[–]
107reasonswhy.bsky.social
•
195 days ago
Let's circle back later this week.
0
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
HAHA we mean wide margin
but also,