!!! NEW: DOJ tells Judge Boasberg that he should CANCEL the 5 p.m. hearing "because there has been no violation of the Court's orders, and because the government is not prepared to disclose any further national security or operational security details." https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436.24.0_2.pdf
Comments
I genuinely think they're actually going to angle for sanctions. Just to whip up backlash.
Countries with de-fanged judiciaries: Russia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Turkey, etc.
So SCOTUS can remain in business ...
Lying to judges is pretty standard for this administration.
So, if the President orders a submarine to fire missiles, and the sub is located in international waters, the captain can ignore the order because US law no longer applies?
SCOTUS will rip their childish arguments to shreds.
Clown short bus
🤡🤡🚐🚐
When will some judge say "enough" and start sanctioning these people?
I recall that Judge Boasberg DID follow up quite promptly with a written injunction.
https://bsky.app/profile/bigcases.bots.law/post/3lklwgmptvv2v
Number 10 through 2:
https://youtu.be/7vN_PEmeKb0
Is this like when Mike Johnson says "what we've known intuitively?"
This criminal president will destroy our nation.
This constitutional crisis calls for House Republicans to bring articles of impeachment and for Senate Republicans to convict and remove this dangerous criminal and his entire law-breaking cabal of cabinet secretaries & advisors.
Enough of the bullshit. Fire away, your Honor.
"power to be exercised by the President such as that conferred by the Act of 1798 is a process WHICH BEGINS WHEN WAR IS DECLARED" Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160, 167 (1948)
When did Congress declare war?
That could have been a totally different judgement but I thought I saw it on this one as the Judge knew they would screw around.
As if there’s a functioning government to speak of! This is your criminal MAGA GOP A.G. Pam Bondi at work, America, an election denier who got the job because she was so… unfit and crooked 😡
What planet do these people live on?
I think we're getting closer to the DOJ and the Trump admin just saying "Meh, we'll do what we want"
Well, let's see how he responds.
(love the profile pic btw)
We had some tasty corned beef and cabbage egg rolls on Saturday night ... w/spicy mustard!
This one is good for them, the people being "removed" are (ostensibly) criminals, gang members, and terrorists. They want to fight the judge over people the public won't support.
First it was USAID
This is exactly why I have been saying judges needed to force the issue
The last two weeks were our best chance at the courts breaking their power grab. Now the fight is going to be extra hard.
Worst for them would be losing support of law enforcement and the military. Foreign Aid, a kid with a green card and a
Respectfully submitted,
DOJ
WOOF
https://open.substack.com/pub/peoplespartyus/p/the-path-of-most-resistance?r=2lkf6n&utm_medium=ios
This is the US's version of its Cultural Revolution, in action.
Yes we can try to take it back, but the other side has more powerful Pokemon right now, and they get to play Calvinball with impunity.
King Trump’s personal Supreme Court have made him King of America.
Everything King Trump does will be part of his presidential duties, and therefore legal
💩
roster of incompetency
Two gone, two to go.
#SchumerResign
#DurbinRetire
Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any
(More)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(end)
That is for the JUDGE to decide, not DOJ!!
That is like a defendant accused of bank robbery telling the judge that he should cancel the hearing because he is innocent and refuses to testify. Not up to him.
Is it too much to hope that the DoJ doesn’t show up and gets a bench warrant in return?
~Edward H. Levi
11/18/1976
(the man who assumed DOJ helm in the wake of Watergate)
Are the courts about to fight back or get pushed aside.
https://bsky.app/profile/marcelias.bsky.social/post/3lkl76in23s2t
🇨🇦💪💙🇺🇦🇬🇱🇲🇽🇵🇦.
They flaunt their lawlessness every day. Do something
@thehoustonwade.bsky.social
But "national security details"? These are people who've been alleged to be gang members, and if giving them a trial would reveal Secret Evidence, guess there's no evidence available so the Feds lose.
Sounds like a conflict of interest?
I read a convoluted childish rant and temper tantrum dressed up like a court filing.
"He can do whatever he wants and you better shut up about it. It's none of your business. So there. Plahhhff."
This is not normal. It's not sane either.
These are not good lawyers
“The Executive Branch has determined …” should involve a (due) process that includes at least some of the details about how that determination is made and applied to these specific people. Alas, that’s a core component of the rule of law.