Every day we're discovering new depths of depravity these fucking creatures are capable of and the only thing we do is pinch out brows and shake our heads in disappointment hoping they'll just hope away but news flash: they won't. if left to their own devices they'll just keep doing this.
this applies to all politicians too btw idc who if you're apart of the system then it's already too late. it can't be fixed so why bother entering the hive in the first place when you can burn it to the ground?
HOLY SHIT. THANK YOU. I am TIRED of being called insane for wanting these unhinged villains to get what they deserve, especially after pulling shit like this.
Many humans are shit. But do you really want 'some humans are not humans' to be accepted as mainstream opinion? In the current political climate? Are you really, REALLY sure you want that accepted as true by other people? Note, they don't have to be not-human in order to justify self-defense.
I do, and I’m tired of pretending I don’t. Dehumanizations begets dehumanization. And some really bad people deserve to be treated as lesser than considering the human rights violating shit they want to subjugate us to. They’re closer to a cancer on society than much of anything.
The problem is you don't actually get 'everyone agrees rich people get less mercy and then eat them' by normalizing 'some humans are not human.' You get 'the right wing decides trans people are not human and therefore an acceptable genocide target.'
I'd say start with the politicians and rich people first. Once they're gone the others won't have enough resources to continue this crap. Brings more than just shouting at incels online someone should kill them.
Qué lindo el futuro, eh? Usar los avances en tecnología para cosificar aún más a las mujeres y alimentar fantasías de acosadores. El progreso, dicen...
I do wonder what the argument for staying on that app is at this point.
How potent must that dopamine hit be to stay on the cybertruck of social media apps? Even in a world where basically all social media is bad (even here!), imagine sticking with the Nazi revenge p*rn platform!! Wild.
The ones still on there generally avoid the topic in my experience, but on the rare occasion they speak on it, it's usually "advertising" reasons. "Broader audience" etc.
Truth is, ppl just don't wanna have to rebuild their following. They're emotionally attached to that number under their name.
I blame the current administration. They are gutting NASA to the point where they will be doing little science in the future and we will be watching other nations do what NASA no longer can.
I was told officially to 'stop spreading misinformation' when I tried to bring up to a group why X is gross and awful. I've given up. If they can't see it for what it is, it's on them at this point.
I deleted all my posts a while back, stopped using it, but kept the account out of some sense of ‘not wanting to concede the ground’ and also not having someone else use my username… but yeah, I should have just deleted it then.
Next best time was now.
I literally feel nauseous now.
I discovered recently that item 230, in the earliest construct of media platforms regs ...is pretty much why we are seeing the basest of humaness being fostered & normalised. Fuck that Fraaaydom of Speech Psychpathic nonsense propoganda for unfettered ABUSE. FOR $$$💔
I was going to say the quick way to shut it down would be a flood of gross nudes of the dickless white boys, but they'd just ban those specifically and carry on.
I'm so happy I never posted a photo of myself on there but yeah. Get off twitter, it's becoming a play ground for tech bros and people who don't believe in consent.
I'm sure it would, but as a whole women don't tend to assume ownership of men's bodies to this degree. Incels tend to focus on women instead of humiliating or self-aggrandizing themselves.
So logically not impossible, but not ripe for mass use.
I'd be surprised if this isn't illegal in the UK, and both the platform (given that it's Grok creating and publishing the image directly) and the user would be guilty. It'd depend on context but hard to see loopholes for most circumstances.
The provisions are almost identical across the UK.
The Communications Act 2003 applies across the whole country anyway, while legislation on malicious communications is very similar in all parts, likewise, laws covering revenge porn.
In addition, even if there are already genuine versions of the sort of image Grok is creating here freely available, there'd still be questions around consent, copyright, intellectual property and image rights.
Where publishers break the law then there are measures that can be taken to hold them to account, and those should very much be used. But that's not necessarily the same thing.
This is a perfect synecdoche for the stupidity/ crassness/ toxicity that is this sort of 'AI'. Grok delivers a picture of a female body in underwear with a head photoshopped in place. it cannot show what the person really looks like naked. But people talk as if (even seem to believe that) it can.
Maybe I didn't express myself as clearly as I might have, because I was focussed on another point, but just to be clear, the fact that the images are fake does not make them any less humiliating, and I think such a facility is horrendous.
“Grok’s ‘remove her clothes’ function is particularly bad because:
—of how accessible the tool is;
—it allows users to reply to publicly posted images on X with a prompt that will undress them; &
—the nonconsensual image if often posted in reply to the user’s original image.”
A pal on social media if seriously trolled by an asshole will immediately destroy them. This includes providing their employer/church/family/friends evidence she acquires skillfully and presents in such a way that it seems prudent for the asshole to lose everything. I've seen her work, flawless✨
I'll add that she tells you how she formulates a plan to acquire information a lot of it intuitive based on the asshole's tendencies/appearance at first, then connections reveal factual data. She lets you read her email meticulously & specifically composed evidence & the responses which are swift.
I am not on X and would never use grok. I am curious though, because of the way the story is written, "any image of a woman", would this, does this, also work on images of men?
Ok thank you - and that was it. I had held on to my account because of work reasons - checking on emerging situations was still useful there at times. But f--- it, I've left now.
Elon personally reinstated multiple people who were banned for posting CSAM (of real children really being horrifically abused). Grok creating CSAM is a forgone conclusion.
Would be nice if law enforcement would do something about it for once. 🤔
It can be bad as is and also it can be worse, both those things can be true.
"wait, does this thing have so few guardrails it could generate csam" is a logical next step and totally worth considering on account og how dangerous and illegal thay would be
why are you less concerned about a machine that would generate adult sexual assault material?
have you considered this? or are we just arguing for fun?
i want a "zero sex assault robots permitted by law" option myself. hold firm at the bargaining table. stop trying to be king of the losers and fight
i didn't wedge that distinction in there. someone else did, and that's the actual issue.
you were following up on that persons position. why make the distinction if it already crossed the line? it sounded like they were voluntarily moving the line to "child porn" without putting up a fight.
EWWWWWW I hope women and anyone victim of this disgusting ai thing can somehow get legal actions against it... This is straight up SA/SH and diffamation...
Can we use this feature to flood Shitter with naked pictures of Musk? Not that anyone would want to see that, but I bet this sexual assault described as a "feature" would get disabled really quickly if it were Musk (or men in general) being undressed by AI.
It's also bc "revenge porn" is framed in public perception as a very specific thing — a former partner getting "revenge" by distributing private images w/o consent to a public audience. IBSA & nonconsensual distribution of intimate images (NCDII) have much broader cases than that to abuse victims.
They could already see women naked. There’s an infinite supply of free porn online. That’s also fine (excepting abusive porn which should fucking die). The problem is that these fuckers want the feeling of control over women they see as inaccessible.
They will love the idea that doing this to real people could cause them humiliation and distress. It’s a way of doing a type of public assault on anyone you want.
They wouldn't lower themselves to look at women who are willing to disrespect and devalue themselves by having sex for money. They have morals, and don't like consent.
Comment-posting my above reply to take issue with my exception on porn is repurposing a good-faith comment on a different issue (written with limited characters) as a target for criticism. Locking replies on your comment-post furthers the posting etiquette fail.
Thanks, I appreciate your perspective. There are lots of injured & fed up people on here and I want to be sensitive to that, but their wording left me wondering if it’s meant to trigger a pile-on, as has been done to me on here before. Many of us are struggling; my PTSD is as real as someone else’s.
Ugh, sorry that happened to you! You definitely didn't say anything bad or worthy of a pile-on, and I really don't think that was their intention. Pretty small account with low engagement, so I would try not worry :)
This is lawsuits waiting to happen. I’m already worried about smelly virgin men doing this to women. I’m even more worried about parents who think it’s smart to post pictures of their children online… especially on Twitter. 🤢
we We are trying to survive In the shadow of endless hell In Gaza The war is back and we are living under siege The prices With no food, no medicine, and constant bombing
If you see this please thinking of helping😭💔🇵🇸 https://gofund.me/f2b59468
people replying to this by saying “oh, we should use this against them!” disgusts me. instead of seeing it as a tool of sexual harassment and denouncing it, they want to use it for their own sick revenge fantasies?
dont give twitter ad revenue and dont destroy the planet further, please.
It's the culmination of the red pill grift. It's not something you do for fun, it's pure performance. Your goal is to have sex with as many of the most conventionally attractive women as possible because other red pill guys will see you as the alpha.
Our culture still glorifies sexual promiscuity when it comes to men but expresses disgust when women do it, because they see it as having owned a woman. And when a woman does it, she's had "too many owners". So yeah it is seen as power and it makes me so god damn sad
If you go all the way back to the PUA communities you'll find it all over the place there. These guys just absolutely obsessing over their ability to get laid but will straight up talk about how sex is disgusting.
I don't know if this is obvious, I honestly don't, but I feel like it needs to be said:
The internet is FULL of pictures of women who consented to be photographed. If you use "AI" to make a woman artificially nude, it's *so that* she'll feel threatened and humiliated. That's the point.
Yes *but* only on the federal level which generally makes it hard to enforce. You wont see any sort of enforceable action against this until individual states start making their own laws. Some states have laws that concern only kids, some--only adults; 6 states have laws concerning both
Its a work in progress. All of these laws were written and passed in 2024 and we're at a total of s/t like 27 states with some sorta legislation about sexual deepfakes
we really need full criminalization and abolition of all LLM generative AI, and enforcement of existing international law that effectively bans all LLMs such as both the UN's universal declaration of human rights and international copyright law.
we must put a total end LLM AI by any means necessary
hmmm, while this absolutely is something that needs to stop, being too blunt with this endeavor also means killing things like neurosama, which i am against due to her being a very fascinating and ethical ongoing development of actual ai, that does require use of things like LLM to function.
The problem is in "asking". No, nothing changes without confrontation. Change needs to be demanded.
Women weren't just gifted the right to vote, bc men up & decided "sure, we guess it's time". George III didn't wake up one day & ask "how'd you guys like to be your own country?".
It's important to fact-check regardless. Grok is right that there's currently a proposed law in MN that would ban "nudify" apps, but it missed the more general ban on distributing deepfake pornography that the state already passed in 2023. https://www.startribune.com/minnesota-senate-bill-deepfake-porn/601232184
100% agree - using AI for law is fraught with problems, notably the AI inventing laws with plausible looking references. But I'm not a lawyer (let alone a US-centric one), so I'm not going to do the fact checking. It's just amusing that Grok will tell you what it is doing is illegal in many states
Pretty sure it’s illegal in South Korea as well. I think it’s one of the charges that Johnny Somali is facing. He made one of him kissing a Korean influencer. They consider that a sex crime with guaranteed time in prison.
I don’t think it’s gone to the courts yet, but it seems plausible, if not likely, that these would not be considered “user-generated” per Section 230. The risk of AI output as a legal liability for sites as publishers is something I’d like to see more about, though it’s speculative for now
Comments
Seems fair
If so, post a few!
nope, cis white incels are not human nor capable of critical growth and you can't possibly convince me otherwise anymore.
this is an argument against what you're saying, not for it
State of this f***ing world.
How potent must that dopamine hit be to stay on the cybertruck of social media apps? Even in a world where basically all social media is bad (even here!), imagine sticking with the Nazi revenge p*rn platform!! Wild.
Truth is, ppl just don't wanna have to rebuild their following. They're emotionally attached to that number under their name.
The sciences and arts are the primary reasons I'm staying.
I've had the account since 2009 but as soon as NASA switches over, I'm gone.
I seem to have been logged out of that account at some point. Oh well.
The trash is sometimes funny when progressive friends pile in on it and otherwise it’s there to scroll past
“Grok” is easy to mute. the dumdum ads are not 😑
I was told officially to 'stop spreading misinformation' when I tried to bring up to a group why X is gross and awful. I've given up. If they can't see it for what it is, it's on them at this point.
Next best time was now.
These freaks are such pantysniffers. 21st century digitised pantysniffing.
I discovered recently that item 230, in the earliest construct of media platforms regs ...is pretty much why we are seeing the basest of humaness being fostered & normalised. Fuck that Fraaaydom of Speech Psychpathic nonsense propoganda for unfettered ABUSE. FOR $$$💔
"this?" "this?"
horifying
So logically not impossible, but not ripe for mass use.
Nope.
A test case would be interesting.
The Communications Act 2003 applies across the whole country anyway, while legislation on malicious communications is very similar in all parts, likewise, laws covering revenge porn.
In addition, even if there are already genuine versions of the sort of image Grok is creating here freely available, there'd still be questions around consent, copyright, intellectual property and image rights.
But they should be held to account under the law for breaches. If that bankrupts them, that's their problem.
Where publishers break the law then there are measures that can be taken to hold them to account, and those should very much be used. But that's not necessarily the same thing.
—of how accessible the tool is;
—it allows users to reply to publicly posted images on X with a prompt that will undress them; &
—the nonconsensual image if often posted in reply to the user’s original image.”
He needs to be 86’d.
Is this something that users agree to in the TOS?
Would be nice if law enforcement would do something about it for once. 🤔
and yeah "hopefully" law enforcement will do something
"wait, does this thing have so few guardrails it could generate csam" is a logical next step and totally worth considering on account og how dangerous and illegal thay would be
have you considered this? or are we just arguing for fun?
i want a "zero sex assault robots permitted by law" option myself. hold firm at the bargaining table. stop trying to be king of the losers and fight
what are you talking about
you were following up on that persons position. why make the distinction if it already crossed the line? it sounded like they were voluntarily moving the line to "child porn" without putting up a fight.
then say no.
Victims of image-based sexual abuse experience similar psychological trauma to those who have survived sexual assaults.
It's punishment for women who dare to speak.
Part one billion.
As much as nobody wants to see Musk in his briefs, how many times do you think it would take in reply to his photos to get this disabled?
That said, he’d likely just special case his photos, or auto-suspend anyone promoting.
She's even on Twitter. With a profile pic and everything.
If you see this please thinking of helping😭💔🇵🇸
https://gofund.me/f2b59468
dont give twitter ad revenue and dont destroy the planet further, please.
What an asshole
Bro was Johnny Somali before Johnny Somali
https://archive.ph/2025.05.06-160818/https://www.404media.co/elon-musks-grok-ai-will-remove-her-clothes-in-public-on-x/
The internet is FULL of pictures of women who consented to be photographed. If you use "AI" to make a woman artificially nude, it's *so that* she'll feel threatened and humiliated. That's the point.
we must put a total end LLM AI by any means necessary
Women weren't just gifted the right to vote, bc men up & decided "sure, we guess it's time". George III didn't wake up one day & ask "how'd you guys like to be your own country?".
Here's a free article that might be related.
https://www.citizen.digital/news/kenyans-on-x-raise-alarm-after-users-use-grok-ai-chatbot-to-undress-women-n362224
steeped in abusive porn.
We know he killed people with his actions with more deaths to come
https://www.startribune.com/minnesota-senate-bill-deepfake-porn/601232184
https://bsky.app/profile/dbfamilylaw.bsky.social/post/3lokuq2ckfk27
Grok: shows Musk
I asked it to put him in lingerie.