Of course, they miss "the good ol days" of the 1940s where they could beat their women and children, drive drunk and keep people who are a little too brown from voting.
Racist misogynistic assholes who can't command respect with their actions, but demand it anyway
It’s not. I just searched the project 2025 document myself. The tip off is that project 2025 is full of statement statements about federal agencies and federal policies. These excerpts aren’t.
Yep. Lots of unnecessary fear-mongering when the reality is frightful enough. There’s also something clearly blacked out at the top of OP’s screenshot. And it’s rich to get a condescending, “it’s a quick search away and the page # is listed,” when it’s actually baloney.
Also: Note that they never believe in the "traditional" role for *men*. In their mind, that role is simply: "Man=In charge." rather than "provider who should put their family ahead of their own wants/needs."
Bear in mind that women - especially young women - have been tacking left lately, so that 37% is only among the women who are somehow still Republicans
I get the being "kept" part, but I can't imagine 1 in 3 women would be good with the no credit card/bank account, hubby signs off on healthcare, fault divorce part. 🤷♂️
They're not thinking about that aspect. Most are far too young to have lived it, probably don't even know it existed, and would add an "well of course we wouldn't do THAT" addendum if asked.
Easy with today’s tech.
So you can really start controlling people’s spending like with a Greenlight card.
Imagine being given a card that can only be used at certain businesses. Wifey/girlfriend/kept person gets a restricted economy.
Which is laughable, given how modest 2nd wave was and how uneven its accomplishments. Of all the social challenges of the 21st century, it's truly pathetic that 2nd wave feminism ranks in anyone's top 10.
A lot of misinfo goes around about the 2nd wave because it certainly had flaws, but it absolutely transformed women's lives for the better. And it included trans women, Black women, other WOC, disabled women who fought against marginalization by both society and fellow feminists.
More alarming is the women, particularly younger ones, who literally don't understand what they're asking for. Just completely hollow headed worthless morons who are going to curse an entire class of people to suffering because they are too dumb to function in a worthwhile society.
Great thing about America- we can live any life we choose. Want a conservative male-dominated household? Knock yourself out
If not, NO ONE should be dictating otherwise. My "conservative" brother, kids & parents would have been destitute w/o a hard-headed liberal sister/daughter bailing them out.
Back to the 1950's when black people knew their place, Hispanics were invisible, gays stayed in the closet, and women stayed in the kitchen. That's what they mean by make America great again. Disgusting that 77 million people voted for that.
White women are also a trip here. They don't care about voting or reproductive rights. So many see themselves as no more than shadows of their men, so if white supremacy keeps the men on top, the girls are cool.
Just more proof that progress should not be taken for granted.
Without care, thought and attention entropy will take over and we will regress.
It would seem that republican men are short on care, thought and attention.
This is why education is important. Republican men who want women to return to tRaDiTiOnAl rOLeS would understand why many unfortunate & fatal accidents befell married men in the days before women’s rights to bank accounts, health decisions, and no-fault divorce.
It's amusing (ironic) men want trad wives - but then expect them to work because they can be expected to financially support a wife & kids. I think they just don't wont to contribute in any way to a functioning household. Just be in charge & give orders.
Their jobs plan is to take women out of the workforce leaving "the work" so they can keep their control over society. Once all of the immigrants are out & the liberals suffer due to social welfare cuts & women back at home, then there will be plenty of jobs for dumbass white men who can't adapt.
For religious Republicans, women only serve their man. They used to make a big deal about other cultures where women take a subservient role claiming that these cultures disrespect women & do not promote freedom. All lies. They just want women to make babies, in particularly white Christian boys.
Yeah, well they should've thought of that before redistributing wealth to the top via their dumb policies that widened income inequality. We weren't able to have one parent stay at home (and it wasn't me) until my pay increased enough that him quitting was a wash.
"Traditional roles" means: "the labor women were required to do, due to having no rights & therefore being dependent on male relatives."
A more truthful way to ask this question is: "Would you like to return to the days when men controlled women, so men can make them do what men want them to do?"
Women have never been prevented from living a "traditional role." They have been excluded from certain colleges and occupations. So obvious that this is about control.
Because if they lose the ones they have, slim chances that anyone else will want them. Interesting how these men can’t figure out that maybe they’re the problem.
I wonder what their mothers think…
As the article points out, saying you're in favor of traditional roles, and living like you're in favor of traditional roles are two different things. It's rightwing virtue signaling.
They're bad husbands and fathers too, they cheat on their partners and physically abuse them. That's why they have the highest divorce rates out of any demographic.
People who have no respect for minorities end up having no respect for those close to them. Zero exceptions.
I’d also like to know how “traditional roles” was defined in the survey or how the question was worded. Not doubting the numbers or anything. Just curious.
Speaking for normal women everywhere: choose the bear and hire women for every job. Republican women helped get us into this mess. They stood with a predator and got nothing for it.
The work around for white evangelicals like Southern Baptists is complementarinism: the woman works and the man makes all the decisions, including how to spen the money.
To that I say, you first. Return to your role as the protector of women. Return to your role as the provider for women. Return to your role as the tender loving husband. You do that...... Become the man who lays down your life before you think about taking mine.
Otherwise STFU💪🇺🇲🤓 and FRO
Yes they do, because in that world women are doing a tremendous amount of unpaid labor that keeps that world running. Other countries have social safety nets, the US has women. Not to mention the household managerial and support duties. Plus all the "menial" jobs
Huh? In actual dollar terms, women are responsible for almost 50% of the US economy on top of keeping their households running with unpaid labor. Do you understand what happens to the US economy if you take women out of the workforce? Hint: It shrinks by almost 50% and collapses.
Huh? Women have always contributed that much of the economy. Before it was just attributed only to men, completely neglecting all the labor women did because their husbands "owned" their contributions. Now that a woman can own property, have a bank account, run businesses, take out loans
If you think when America was great by their standards women were not contributing their equal share of the economy you've got another thing coming. That's the great erasure of women's contributions to the entirety of human history
I think it’s very funny to want a return to single-income households while voting for the party that wants to reduce the number of jobs that can support two or more people.
This is a great point! It has (almost) always been that the older women get, the more left-leaning they become. In today’s world, most younger women are already there.
This is the one that really weirds me out, because for a while that trend was reversing. My cousin didn't take her husband's name, neither did my sister, and i know MANY people who went the hyphenated route. But in the last like 10 years, it's been going back to wives taking husbands names
See that's a hard one, right? So historically, when the GOP fell out of favor, you saw a rise in Libertarians, Constitutionalists, etc. ESPECIALLY after Bush II. But Trump is a different story, cause he captured the Right's "Great Man Myth" aesthetic and each of those camps can find something in him
Yeah, your comment made me realize that most of the polling I’ve been seeing lately is comparing Dems/ind/rep and independents have been aligning more closely with Dems than I remember seeing before. Food for thought at least
Comments
(/sarcasm which would be obvious except for the fact that we live in hell)
Racist misogynistic assholes who can't command respect with their actions, but demand it anyway
Also: Note that they never believe in the "traditional" role for *men*. In their mind, that role is simply: "Man=In charge." rather than "provider who should put their family ahead of their own wants/needs."
So you can really start controlling people’s spending like with a Greenlight card.
Imagine being given a card that can only be used at certain businesses. Wifey/girlfriend/kept person gets a restricted economy.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/second-wave-feminism
A lot of misinfo goes around about the 2nd wave because it certainly had flaws, but it absolutely transformed women's lives for the better. And it included trans women, Black women, other WOC, disabled women who fought against marginalization by both society and fellow feminists.
If not, NO ONE should be dictating otherwise. My "conservative" brother, kids & parents would have been destitute w/o a hard-headed liberal sister/daughter bailing them out.
Without care, thought and attention entropy will take over and we will regress.
It would seem that republican men are short on care, thought and attention.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/early-women-were-hunters-not-just-gatherers-study-suggests-180982459/
Are wages going to massively improve so the man can support a family of 4 by himself again?
No?
Well then what's the point?
A more truthful way to ask this question is: "Would you like to return to the days when men controlled women, so men can make them do what men want them to do?"
But let's be honest, that's not what these people want.
I wonder what their mothers think…
also these guys:
People who have no respect for minorities end up having no respect for those close to them. Zero exceptions.
I think a lot of these "Republican" men view it as an insult to their manhood if a wife has to work to support a family.
No? What is wrong with it, if you are trying to push it on women?
Otherwise STFU💪🇺🇲🤓 and FRO
Dumb asses.