I teamed up with @tparsi to analyze a possible silver-lining in the next four years of foreign policy for the @latimes — rejecting the neo-imperial “rules-based international order” meme of recent years, in favor something better rather than worse. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2025-01-08/trump-foreign-policy-world-order
Comments
Who was president of the United States between 2017 and 2021 and what was his foreign policy like?
WTFG douchebag.
Second, Trump is a nationalist imperialist?! Is your hope that we just enter a great power imperialist hellscape?
LA Times literally endorsing the idea of tearing it all down, but what replaces the international rule of law? That's Mein Trumpf's decision.
But literally the day after he threatened three allies with forceful annexation?
This is not a shining week for political journalism.
Stop trying to sane-wash Trump.
Go to hell, you sad excuse for a journalist
Anyway, enjoy Israel invading Syria with Trump’s eager banking, you pathetic sucker.
So is 2pac not actually being dead.
"Trump is a keen advocate for his own interests."
*This is not an asset, it's a liability*
I suppose at least it isn’t the “Neo-imperialism of the rules-based international order”.
Writing that the day after Trump threatens to send our troops to invade Greenland and Panama and Canada is certainly a choice!
Wonder if he told the authors here exactly what he wanted them to write and they just went for it?