That was a very effective speech.
You can hate it or him.
But that speech was aimed squarely at issues where the public is with Trump -- and filled with made-for-sharing moments.
A master image-maker at work (and you can hate him and acknowledge that's true!)
You can hate it or him.
But that speech was aimed squarely at issues where the public is with Trump -- and filled with made-for-sharing moments.
A master image-maker at work (and you can hate him and acknowledge that's true!)
Comments
You be swearing your takes are fair and balanced. Ain't nobody falling for your gaslighting. The speech was bogus and full of lies. Stop it.
That is journalistic malpractice and it's why our democracy is in shreds.
Delete yourself.
If it defines "lies" as "made-for-sharing moments," it must be a real hoot!
#FuckTrump
Those are "the morons." The ones with room temperature IQs and worrying lack of self-awareness.
"We're with you!" -the Public
Also, spare me Chris. Seriously, just fucking spare me.
Ratio
You can hate it or him.
But this take is aimed squarely at the cynical belief that savviness at the expense of democracy is laudatory, which is something that shouldn't be shared.
A master simpleton at work (and you can hate him and acknowledge that's true!)
Come to the UK. I'll take you out for a pint and you can hear how your creepy fucking hero sounds to the rest of the civilised world.
Just say he lied, list the lies and admit that they going to damage the citizens, and that's the truth.
Please consider doing literally anything else with your life.
I thought the part where he taunted his own cabinet and preemptively started deferring blame on them was a good taste of things to come.
By the way, Hitler also delivered effective speeches.
Is a journalist supposed to characterize a speech filled with LIES as effective?
You can hate it or him.
But that post was aimed squarely at issues where the public is for calling a Cilliza a dipshit -- and filled with made-for-quote words.
A master dipshit-pointer at work (and you can hate him and acknowledge that's true!)
https://bsky.app/profile/chriscillizza.bsky.social/post/3ljigftosik2o
Bigotry and lies are quite effective when there aren't journalists willing to point them out.
Is that what effective means now? Utter BS?
If Trump was a "master image-maker" Chris could post examples of said images.
But none of it's true, Chris is just a dimwit paid to talk out of his ass, not make verifiable claims.
HEY YOU CAN HATE HITLER BUT BOY DID HE ACCOMPLISH THINGS. Awesome. Great insight. Thanks, dickbag.