The boys and I figured we’d ask ChatGPT to help us solve a clue from the Times crossword.
1 / 2
Comments
Software Engineer: “How should this software feature work?”
Product Manager: “How to you think it should work?”
AI has a bright future.
outstanding im speechless
There. There wolf.
The end.
"Well, that's a puzzler, isn't it?"
"Quite the headscratcher."
"Gosh, I guess I missed again. Are you sure this is a real puzzle?
"Well, fuck me."
"Look here, you bastard."
“Yeah, I have absolutely no clue what I’m doing. Can we please do something else instead?”
- Every AI-horny techbro out there.
(i didn't need chatgpt lol)
ChatGPT was like "meh, be careful with all household chemicals, but it's nothing special."
lolwut
https://x.com/VVB_LJ/status/1699055747739595136?s=20
Or to identify exotic languages, like French.
https://x.com/VVB_LJ/status/1694393565126832400?s=20
“I need a five-letter word that starts with A, with L as the fourth letter and that doesn’t include the letter B”
“The word you’re looking for is ALBUM!”
uh towergpt, there is no runway 21 right
delta you are correct land runway 21 left
tower there is no runway 21 did you mean runway 5 right
sorry delta land on interstate 5
HumanATC: Um...Delta only has 8 flights.
Tower GPT: Are you having difficulties, Delta flight 6?
(reference: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/18/us-stealth-f-35-fighter-jet-crash-south-carolina-update)
I've said this before, but ChatGPT is *extremely* overrated.
In all honesty, I suspect LLMs are a giant bubble that's just waiting to pop, much like NFTs.
AI and machine learning are useful, unlike blockchain — we've actually been using neural networks for decades and research has been going on since the 40's — but LLMs are a dead end.
He could do it to chatgpt with a game of peek-a-boo.
AI strikes again.
Did you have any letters?
Sorry, but AIs are going to take over the world and steal our jerbs!
ChatGPT worker: Sends me a long winded email about why it won't have the reports I asked for today
Sarah Connor: ...no
T-800: I'm sorry! Clearly you are not Sarah Connor.
*MANKIND WINS*
Oh.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f0Q2itRTeM
Hanging plants dont, which I heard recently is the reason orchids are so notoriously hard to keep alive at home, theyre suffocating in soil and prefer to be hanging plants
We have the archaeology
1. GPTs look at chunks of words called tokens, not individual letters. We see words as sequences of letters, it does not.
2. Because everything is done in one pass, it can't "notice" a past mistake unless you ask it to review.
Human, less than 3 seconds 🙄
I tried this experiment; eventually told chatgpt to come up with every 4-letter animal and try the reverse. it identified "deer/reed" but decided a "reed" is not a plant, and discarded it.
When I asked it to Google the answer it found it, but did not recognize that it tried it already. Interesting.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6803124/
(tbh I think the actual answer was a tiny bit of a stretch, but that's par for the course with the NYT)
Very impressed with brain the size of a planet
If I’m correct, I figured it out in less than a second and I’m relatively smart but not smart enough for it not to be incredibly worrying that everyone’s boss is trying to replace them with an AI that is less intelligent than I am.
However, it also, with lots of coaxing, came up with 'gnat' (arguable an 'animal'), and, though ChatGPT didn't know it, a 'tang' is a collection of seaweed.
It's not going to be intelligent until we make it intelligent.
And we seriously do NOT want to go there.
💀💀💀