Larp my ass. If you took anytime to search anything out other than drinking bleach, you would easily find me in in scholarly journals, a vetting by fucking Snopes and a book you could even read about the AltGov.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
What are 3 tangible, demonstrable things the "alt" accounts have done to improve people's lives in a material way that did not involve a profit of some sort for the "alt" accounts?
the vetting applies to the original Twitter accounts, there's no such vetting for any of the current bsky accounts. every time I asked for one I got blocked.
buddy nobody is risking their job to be an “angry staffer” or an “alt agency whatever.” nobody is gonna risk their pension to sell shitty tshirts and repost grifters. you’re like bargain bin krassensteins. that’s so sad
Wow a book?! Nobody's ever written bullshit in one of those.
I'll read it later, first I gotta take a big swig of my coffee and catch up with my favourite podcast @ifbookspod.bsky.social
What am I grifting by promoting a book i wasnt a part of and no one in altgov makes money from? Have you researched the book before calling me a grifter?
Yeah, you're some guy. You're starting off aggreived replies with "Larp my ass." Like, come on man. It's ok, you wanted to feel like you were helping, maybe make some money while doing it. That's understandable.
But you don't work at the FDA, and that's fine, but pretending you do isn't.
That’s a good question, Hailey. It’s always wise to verify information, especially when it comes from unfamiliar sources. What made you ask about this specific account? Understanding *why* you're questioning it is helpful. Critical thinking is useful in many fields!
A domain doesn’t automatically equal truth! It's useful to look at *how* an account presents information. Do they cite sources? Is the information consistent with established knowledge? Cross-referencing is key. A healthy dose of skepticism is good practice.
Note that they are also acting like an idiot, calling people names, and generally making a fool of themselves. Does that seem likely to be who they say they are?
Behavior is definitely a factor. Official organizations usually maintain a certain level of professionalism in their communications. While not foolproof, consistent unprofessional conduct *could* indicate an inauthentic account. Observe, analyze, then decide.
Is this reply supposed to make us trust you as a source? Accusing people of drinking bleach for not knowing the name of the person running an anon account (by design)? And citing Snopes as your reliable source?
The domain that was registered just this year, giving credibility that these are _totally_ the same guys from 2016 and _absolutely_ not some randoms trying to make a few bucks off of BlueAnon resistlibs
You fucking prove I’m not who I am. Your the one looking for a socialist info had out. I can’t even with you biches and your prove it shit. What a bunch of fucking losers
Do you have post graduate degrees or undergraduate degrees. You don't write or appear to think as though you do. Nothing wrong with not having them, but they are harder to get than it seems you realize. What do you do for the company and what does the company do.
You were one of the least annoying alt accounts (and also most relevant to my job) so I followed despite my skepticism of its authenticity. But this is straight-up clown behavior lmfao. 🤡
I'll be your second. I want to pick up one of Uniqlo’s ultra stretch dresses. They have pockets! Might as keep you company while this fool falls into the grave they dug for themselves.
There’s a trust me bro list from 2017 and if whoops it turned out the accounts wererun by a “deliberate hoaxer” the writer promised the list would be updated
Dropping the mask to reveal he's just a chaos agent/grifter. In the grand tradition of Mensch, Taylor, Bill Palmer, Angry Staffer and every 'Alt' gov account under the sun.
If I didn’t already know all the alt accts were a grift, these responses CLEARLY show you are very full of shit. Smart people don’t suddenly sound stupid when they get mad. Thanks for making it crystal clear, I hope your marks see this!
When the con man realizes his Bluff check has failed, he switches to Intimidate -- but it's still a Bluff, 'cause he ain't got nothin' to back up his bluster with.
Sweetie. It’s me. Your mom. I’m sorry I have to contact you through here but you haven’t come out of the basement in months and the stench is unbearable
Would you please come back up? We need the basement to store the Christmas stuff and we need to talk about the importance of showering.
Nothing worse than asking for proof of a claim. Doing so is completely antithetical to the aims of the FDA and I'm proud of you for taking such a firm stance.
Which oil billionaire is funding you to pretend to be a former FDA employee for clout? The same one that helped Charlie Kirk get his org off the ground?
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire
Wait it gets better, them being "in journals" is apparently a reference to their account being one of the accounts mentioned in a study that concludes that the vast majority of the accounts aren't run by federal employees 💀
It’s giving: “What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed” etcetera
It'd be funny if all the other gimmick grift accounts were this hostile.
LegalBeagle: "Listen here you fucking idiots, I really AM a beagle that responds to Supreme Court decisions that are bad by posting pictures of growling dogs! Put respect on my name you fucking pricks!"
Yeah but you did throw a temper tantrum over the idea that you could potentially be fake, screamed at people that they were wrong for wanting information, said you didn't know what burden of proof is, among other things
So at best you are way too emotional to actually be the person doing this
*IF* you are real find someone actually in it for the real fight who is going to understand that burden of proof is on the account and who actually wants to do the work all these "alt" accounts claim they want to do.
Sir/ma'am/tha'am/etc, you have just mentioned a book and refused to link it. Instead of bothering to provide any documents you've been accredited on or for.
Grifter, just like every other alt-gov account. If you had influence, and a set of morals, you would have canned indivisible for not masking.
He's "in" the journal in the sense that they did a study that concludes most of these accounts aren't run by federal employees and he's apparently one of the accounts they used for the study 💀
Lol citing Snopes like they don't do the same libby bullshit like "um that's technically a lie, Biden only promised the gross poors he'd be a one term, he never said it to like.....people"
I’m not your fucking bitch, go do your own damn research. Stop being lazy and only asking for shit like MAGA does. If I gave it to you, that would be a socialist hand out.
There's a big difference btwn not caring what ppl think of you and accepting that and acting so fucking annoying that no one likes and making it your brand. One's authentic, the other makes you a hack who's a thin-skinned lying sack of shit.
All of you literally do. Name me one of you who actually works at the FDA. I'll be waiting a while, but I'm challenging you anyways. Nobody believes you, bro. This meltdown makes you look even more like a liar.
Hey, just fyi. You kinda let your mask slip there. We lefties kinda like socialism these days. Acting like socialism is bad shows us you're not one of us.
No they brag constantly about how they did everything totally by themselves and claim they're being held back by other people asking for help, while entirely ignoring how much they've actually been coddled by their privilege.
No, professionally he cited as The_For_Real_AltFDA. You wouldn’t believe the number imposters also trying to publish under his name in the peer reviewed journal SHITTY MEME ACCOUNTS NOT BEING BIG MAD, RED & NUDE ONLINE QUARTERLY.
hey since you're here i have a completely serious unironic question - i'm morbidly curious about what your main source of income is doing this. it is like t-shirts or zoom calls or what
I have a real job and will not say more. You need to step back and take a look at who you are putting together in a group. Nat park is not AltGov and not vetted. They do their own stupid shit. That’s why we have badges and they do not.
I believe the LARP is that they are still active members of the fascist occupied government doing all the fascist stuff but they're posting epic memes while doing it. Like heroes.
Let me guess, your girlfriend is also a supermodel but we’ll never meet her because she lives in Canada and you can’t tell us her name because she wants her privacy.
I personally think its funny that you invoke scientific method and credibility and are also piss-scared of having your work checked by your peers (shitposters)
I thought the whole point of agencies like the FDA was that they were to have all sorts of information at their fingertips so the public could use them as a resource. Super important to want to go to a non-MAGA one right now, with RFK Jr being as he is, but here we are.
Buddy we're already never voting for Democrats ever again, relax and focus on the task at hand: propaganda for PAC interests and proliferating bot engagement to manufacture consent
That's the tell that it's just a troll. Not even trying, just desperately trying to wind up folks who take AltGov accounts seriously. "He said he was with the FDA, but he was *so mean*! My confidence in government is shaken and I like RFK Jr. now!"
"Troll" is actually the kindest possible interpretation, because it implies a kind of deliberation, rather than the other possibility of an FDA employee who desperately wants to be taken seriously while demonstrating the self-control of a toddler.
It's kind of hilarious someone pretending to be a rogue member of the Food and Drug Administration and then spending this much effort resisting requests for evidence of validity and efficacy.
BlueSky leads me down the most fascinating rabbit holes, but I did not have “learning about bee life stages and how their experiences early in life affect their aggression levels” on my bingo card.
Entirely unrelated to the current conversation, I’m just having a good time!
This Snopes article, that hasn’t been updated since 2017, and is trust me bro, and also says some accounts may be LARPers (but maybe not deliberate hoaxers or grifters ahahahaha)
Sounds like did actual fact checking at the time involving talking to actual verified humans with IDs and such, but the article itself has a big bold disclaimer that they are not going to update it and that it might go out of date.
No they’re not. This is from the Snopes page you linked to. The same article also discusses their process of how they verified the accounts at the time, it’s a more than just “trust me bro”
I’m not saying that makes the guy currently in the crosshairs valid (after 8 years, who knows who’s currently at the head or if they still work there). I’m just saying, there’s no reason to misrepresent a source. “The article is 8 years old and explicitly warns that it’s not up to date” is enough.
Your anger is misdirected. Unscrupulous actors are co-opting the “Alt” brand. While you may stand behind your work people pointing out errors with presented data should please you on one hand but anger you that what you are taken seriously others are treating as a game or a joke.
Comments
What's your name?
I'll read it later, first I gotta take a big swig of my coffee and catch up with my favourite podcast @ifbookspod.bsky.social
On Al Gore's Internet?
Because anytime you people are asked for any verifiable details you get big mad.
It means when any of the Alt Gov accounts tout the book as evidence of being vetted as ex or current federal employees they are full of shit
Very informative
Which scholarly journals?
What are the snopes articles?
What is the title of the book?
You wouldn't know the Snopes Article, it goes to a different school
The book is "All Proper Real Science Stuff About Everything Ever"
But you don't work at the FDA, and that's fine, but pretending you do isn't.
Where you fall on that spectrum, I can't say. But I do know you're somewhere on it.
you can't even center your profile picture's logo correctly
(Narrator: It could not be proven. It was just another #ResistanceGrifter account.)
*bitches
8-)
You might want to unfollow
"prove it"
"I won't!"
okay bud. i'm superman
What a time to be alive
You made the claim, you have to prove it.
get that shitty tumbler/twitter ass mid00s drama bull shit on out of here. lol
“handout”
only the most confident and respectable people blow up and start insulting everyone when challenged.
There’s a trust me bro list from 2017 and if whoops it turned out the accounts wererun by a “deliberate hoaxer” the writer promised the list would be updated
See Editor’s note, no one monitored the accounts
When the con man realizes his Bluff check has failed, he switches to Intimidate -- but it's still a Bluff, 'cause he ain't got nothin' to back up his bluster with.
Heard you were talkin’ shit
*hand
*bitches
Would you please come back up? We need the basement to store the Christmas stuff and we need to talk about the importance of showering.
socialist... info.. hand out...
No idea what "a socialist info had out" is supposed to mean.
* bitches
* "I'm" not "What"
3/10. Barely literate bait.
Rules is rules
I AM THE FDA!
"biches"
Is a 5th grader running this account?
BOZO ALARM
BOZO ALARM
-AltFDA
LegalBeagle: "Listen here you fucking idiots, I really AM a beagle that responds to Supreme Court decisions that are bad by posting pictures of growling dogs! Put respect on my name you fucking pricks!"
So at best you are way too emotional to actually be the person doing this
Grifter, just like every other alt-gov account. If you had influence, and a set of morals, you would have canned indivisible for not masking.
https://bsky.app/profile/matchatea420.bsky.social/post/3lrt4hgxigk26
in fact making a post is one such method
Potty mouth
PWNED
I know it's hard to imagine but there isnt just centrists and neonazis in America
Literally everyone is laughing at you as you’re unmanned and made into their bitch.
imagine using socialism as an insult in 2025 what a joke
"fuck you bitch i'm real"
"prove it"
"fuck you bitch i'm not doxxing myself"
yeah, real trustoworthy source of information. where's your grifting t-shirt shop, big shoots?
POST THE SOURCES AND EVIDENCE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE
Oh you're another one of these fucking grifter pieces of shit.
Trying to get in on the "Alt National Park" action, eh you lazy fuck?
So this is the caliber of mind we're dealing with
Entirely unrelated to the current conversation, I’m just having a good time!
Anyway, fairly sure almost all of the alt gov dept accounts are run by the same person
this account also straight up invented overall attendance at the no kings protests